CONTINUED PATRONAGE AFTER HYGIENE PENALTIES AND EXTENDED TPB STUDY IN ALOR SETAR

Authors

  • MUHAMMAD HAZIQ MOHD HAFIZ Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Penang Branch, Penang, Malaysia.
  • JOESRI MOHAMAD SABER Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Penang Branch, Penang, Malaysia.
  • MUHAMMAD IZZUL IRFAN NAZARUDDIN Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Penang Branch, Penang, Malaysia.
  • AZLAN SALIM Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Penang Branch, Penang, Malaysia.
  • RAJA ISKANDAR PUTERA RAJA MUSTAPHA Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Penang Branch, Penang, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si5.1737

Keywords:

Theory of Planned Behaviour, continued patronage intention, perceived risk, restaurant hygiene, consumer behaviour, food safety

Abstract

Hygiene enforcement can alter how customers evaluate a restaurant, although a previous violation does not necessarily end subsequent patronage. Evidence explaining this behaviour remains limited, particularly after customers become aware of an official hygiene penalty. This study therefore examined Continued Patronage Intention toward a Nasi Kandar restaurant in Alor Setar by incorporating Perceived Risk into the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Questionnaire data from 351 customers were analysed with SPSS. The four-predictor regression model accounted for 28.5% of variation in Continued Patronage Intention. Attitude recorded the largest standardised effect (β = .321, p < .001). Subjective Norm (β = .216, p < .001) and Perceived Behavioural Control (β = .173, p = .001) were also significant, whereas Perceived Risk was not (β = −.010, p = .837). The evidence therefore supports the three original TPB determinants in this post-enforcement context but does not show an additional direct contribution from Perceived Risk. The findings provide a behavioural explanation for continued restaurant patronage after hygiene action and suggest that customer evaluation, social influence, and perceived control remain relevant when operators seek to recover customer confidence.

References

[1] Ajzen, I. (2020): The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. – Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2(4): 314-324.

[2] Choi, J., Nelson, D.C., Almanza, B. (2019): Food safety risk for restaurant management: Use of restaurant health inspection report to predict consumers’ behavioral intention. – Journal of Risk Research 22(11): 1443-1457.

[3] Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM) (2024): Economic census 2023: Food and beverage services sector. – Department of Statistics Malaysia 1p.

[4] Flanagan, M.A., Soon-Sinclair, J.M. (2025): Consumers’ perceptions of regulatory food hygiene inspections of restaurants and takeaways. – British Food Journal 127(3): 897-913.

[5] Halimi, F.F., Gabarre, S., Rahi, S., Al-Gasawneh, J.A., Ngah, A.H. (2021): Modelling Muslims’ revisit intention of non-halal certified restaurants in Malaysia. – Journal of Islamic Marketing 13(11): 2437-2461.

[6] Ishak, N., Ismail, A., Saad, M., Md Ramli, A. (2021): Researching Kedah’s Malay heritage food tradition and eating culture. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 11(16): 140-154.

[7] Ji, Y., Lee, W.S., Moon, J. (2023): Café food safety and its impacts on intention to reuse and switch cafés during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Starbucks. – International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(3): 11p.

[8] Jin, H., Lin, Z., McLeay, F. (2020): Negative emotions, positive actions: Food safety and consumer intentions to purchase ethical food in China. – Food Quality and Preference 85: 12p.

[9] Liu, P., Lee, Y.M. (2018): An investigation of consumers’ perception of food safety in the restaurants. – International Journal of Hospitality Management 73: 29-35.

[10] Loh, Z., Hassan, S.H. (2022): Consumers’ attitudes, perceived risks and perceived benefits towards repurchase intention of food truck products. – British Food Journal 124(4): 1314-1332.

[11] Memon, M.A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., Cham, T.H. (2020): Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. – Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 4(2): 20p.

[12] Pai, C.-K., Chen, H., Wang, Y. (2024): The moderating effect of safety image on guests’ perceived risk and revisit intentions in luxury hotels. – International Journal of Tourism Research 26(1): 16p.

[13] Radio Televisyen Malaysia (2025): Restoran nasi kandar kotor di Alor Setar diarah tutup. – Radio Televisyen Malaysia 1p.

[14] Rajput, A., Gahfoor, R.Z. (2020): Satisfaction and revisit intentions at fast food restaurants. – Future Business Journal 6: 12p.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CONTINUED PATRONAGE AFTER HYGIENE PENALTIES AND EXTENDED TPB STUDY IN ALOR SETAR. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(SI5), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si5.1737