MASTERING LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO WRITING SCHOLARLY LEGAL ARTICLES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.893Keywords:
legal writing, article, journal, academic writingAbstract
Legal writing is fundamental to academic and professional legal practice, requiring clarity, critical analysis, appropriate methodology, and systematic organisation. This article provides a practical guide to writing scholarly legal articles by addressing essential stages of the writing and publication process. It discusses major forms of legal scholarship, including doctrinal, comparative, qualitative, case commentary, and mixed-method legal articles. The article outlines key pre-writing considerations involving topic selection, background research, identification of primary and secondary legal sources, and organisation of main ideas. It further explains the essential components of a scholarly manuscript, covering the abstract, keywords, introduction, literature review, methodology, findings and discussion, conclusion, recommendations, and references. Practical examples are incorporated to demonstrate how legal arguments, authorities, and research findings can be effectively structured and presented. Finally, the article highlights post-writing considerations, including journal selection, formatting, proofreading, originality checking, submission, and responding to editorial feedback to enhance publication readiness and scholarly quality.
References
[1] Adibah, S. (2024): Abortion in Malaysia: Challenges and necessity. – In: Bloomer, F., Turtle, K. (eds.) Reimagining Faith and Abortion: A Global Perspective, Policy Press, Bristol 16p.
[2] Annesley, T.M. (2010): The discussion section: Your closing argument. – Clinical Chemistry 56(11): 1671-1674.
[3] Athukorala, K., Oulasvirta, A., Głowacka, D., Vreeken, J., Jacucci, G. (2014): Narrow or broad? Estimating subjective specificity in exploratory search. – Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 9p.
[4] Barkan, S.M., Mersky, R.M., Dunn, D.J. (2009): Fundamentals of legal research. – Foundation Press 810p.
[5] Blackham, A. (2022): When law and data collide: The methodological challenge of conducting mixed methods research in law. – Journal of Law and Society 49(S1): S87-S104.
[6] Budianto, A. (2020): Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. – International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9: 1339-1346.
[7] Calkin, S., Berny, E. (2021): Legal and non-legal barriers to abortion in Ireland and the United Kingdom. – Medicine Access @ Point of Care 5: 10p.
[8] Chow, B.J.H., Ng, G.K.M., Kuek, C.Y. (2023): Abortion law in Malaysia: Time to review? – Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Digitalization 2023 (ICLD 2023) 10p.
[9] Dobinson, I., Johns, F. (2007): Qualitative legal research. – In: McConville, M., Chui, W.H. (eds.) Research Methods for Law, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 30p.
[10] Duncan, N.J., Hutchinson, T. (2012): Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. – Deakin Law Review 17(1): 83-119.
[11] Firzaa, N.R. (2019): A comparative legal studies of abortion policies in Indonesia, Malaysia and England. – Indonesian Comparative Law Review 2(1): 28-38.
[12] Hamzani, A.I., Widyastuti, T.V., Khasanah, N., Rusli, M.H.M. (2023): Legal research method: Theoretical and implementative review. – International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology 10(2): 3610-3619.
[13] Husni, A.B.M., Basir, A.M., Nor, A.H.M., Laluddin, H., Al-Samuri, M.A. (2013): Abortion in Malaysian law: A comparative study with Islamic jurisprudence. – Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 7: 39-51.
[14] Islam, M.A., Aldaihani, F.M.F. (2022): Justification for adopting qualitative research method, research approaches, sampling strategy, sample size, interview method, saturation, and data analysis. – Journal of International Business and Management 5(1): 1-11.
[15] Kai, Y. (2018): The guiding function and role of the case-commentary study on the style of civil litigation documents. – China Legal Science 6: 27p.
[16] Knight, L.V., Steinbach, T.A. (2008): Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. – International Journal of Doctoral Studies 3: 21p.
[17] Lipson, C. (2011): Cite right: A quick guide to citation styles-MLA, APA, Chicago, the sciences, professions, and more. – University of Chicago Press, Chicago 213p.
[18] Low, W.Y., Tong, W.T., Wong, Y.L., Jegasothy, R., Choong, S.P. (2015): Access to safe legal abortion in Malaysia: Women’s insights and health sector response. – Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 27(1): 33-37.
[19] Mauer, B., Venecek, J. (2022): Writing the literature review. – Strategies for Conducting Literary Research 10p.
[20] Mecinska, L., James, C., Mukungu, K. (2024): Criminalisation of women accessing abortion and enforced mobility within the European Union and the United Kingdom. – In: Hughes Miller, M. (ed.) Criminalising Motherhood and Reproduction, Routledge, Abingdon 16p.
[21] Meeker, H. (1996): Stalking the golden topic: A guide to locating and selecting topics for legal research papers. – Utah Law Review 1996: 26p.
[22] Moon, D.S., Thompson, J., Whiting, S. (2019): Lost in the process? The impact of devolution on abortion law in the United Kingdom. – The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21(4): 728-745.
[23] Nurhayati, D.A.W. (2022): The relevance of adopting proofreading tools to maintain academic writing integrity and coherence text. – Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics 7(2): 373-396.
[24] Nuruddeen, M. (2015): The legal critical literature review. – UUM Journal of Legal Studies 6: 13-32.
[25] Osbeck, M.K. (2012): What is “good legal writing” and why does it matter? – Drexel Law Review 4(2): 417-466.
[26] Rai, N., Thapa, B. (2015): A study on purposive sampling method in research. – Kathmandu School of Law, Kathmandu 12p.
[27] Randawar, D.K., Ikhsan, M.I., Rani, A.R.A., Ali, S.A.M., Ramaiah, S.S. (2025): Prevention over punishment: Restoring hope through Malaysian Child Act 2001. – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 9(5): 857-866.
[28] Romanis, E.C. (2023): Abortion access and the benefits and limitations of abortion-permissive legal frameworks: Lessons from the United Kingdom. – Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32(3): 378-390.
[29] Rubin, E.L. (1988): The practice and discourse of legal scholarship. – Michigan Law Review 86(8): 1835-1905.
[30] Simons, S.L. (2006): Navigating through the fog: Teaching legal research and writing students to master indeterminacy through structure and process. – Journal of Legal Education 56(3): 356-373.
[31] Sloan, A.E. (2009): Basic legal research: Tools and strategies. – Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 357p.
[32] Tullu, M.S. (2019): Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key. – Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 13(Suppl. 1): S12-S17.
[33] Van Hoecke, M. (2013): Methodology of comparative legal research. – Pravovedenie 6: 121-135.
[34] William, F.K.A. (2024): Guide to crafting an influential research paper: A comprehensive step-by-step approach. – International Journal of Research Publications 143(1): 128-133.
[35] Wutich, A., Beresford, M., Bernard, H.R. (2024): Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis: An integrative review, empirical guidance, and next steps. – International Journal of Qualitative Methods 23: 1-14.
[36] Yadav, S.P. (2023): Sources of law legislation. – Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research 5(1): 10p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MUHAMMAD IZWAN IKHSAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
