INVESTIGATING GROUP WORK ONLINE THROUGH THEORY OF CONNECTIVISM

Authors

  • SHABINA KUMARI SUBRAMANIAM Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NUR ASHIQUIN C ALIH Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NABILA EIZATI KOMARUDIN Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • SITI SYAIRAH FAKHRUDDIN Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Perak, Malaysia.
  • NOOR HANIM RAHMAT Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i5.853

Keywords:

connectivism theory, autonomy, openness, connectedness and diversity, online group work

Abstract

The well-established pedagogy, group work is a key component of teaching and learning as it offers a wide range of benefits to learners across all education levels. In fact, advancements in digital technology today have simplified the incorporation of online group work in academic environments. However, the growing application of online group activities in higher education is not without any issues. While it offers endless possibilities of a more effective learning experience, challenges in incorporating online group works are inevitable. Moreover, limited empirical research has examined online group collaboration through the lens of connectivism. Hence, the current study aims to explore online group work using connectivism theory. A quantitative survey was shared online to 180 students at a public university. The survey consists of 4 sections; Section A on demographic profile, Section B on online teaching presence, Section C on cognitive presence, and Section D on social presence. The findings of the study revealed that in line with connectivism theory, autonomy, openness and connectedness and diversity show strong intercorrelations in online group work approaches. Based on the findings, this framework can be a guideline for a thoughtful instructional design. Thus, the study suggests educators design purposeful online group work experiences using the principles of teaching presence, cognitive presence and social presence that can enhance group work practices in digital environments.

References

[1] Aderibigbe, S.A. (2021): Can online discussions facilitate deep learning for students in general education? – Heliyon 7(3): 1-6.

[2] Bowers, J., Kumar, P. (2015): Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. – International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies 10: 27-44.

[3] Chang, B., Kang, H. (2016): Challenges facing group work online. – Distance Education 37(1): 73-88.

[4] Chen, P.S.D., Gonyea, R., Kuh, G. (2008): Learning at a distance: Engaged or not? – Innovate: Journal of Online Education 4(3): 7p.

[5] Conrad, R.M., Donaldson, J.A. (2011): Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. – John Wiley & Sons 160p.

[6] Corbett, F., Spinello, E. (2020): Connectivism and leadership: Harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. – Heliyon 6(1): 1-9.

[7] Fakir, M.S.B., Azman, H.A.B., Zahid, A.Z.B.M. (2024): Exploring online group work through Connectivism Theory. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 14(8): 2556-2569.

[8] Garrison, D.R. (2011): E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. – Routledge 184p.

[9] Gasmi, A.A. (2022): Through the lens of students: How online discussion forums affect students’ learning. – International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE) 5(4): 669-684.

[10] Gillett-Swan, J. (2017): The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. – Journal of Learning Design 10(1): 20-30.

[11] Harianingsih, I., Jusoh, Z., Muhammad Nur, R. (2021): From face-to-face to digital learning: seen from EFL student's lenses enrolled in online group work. – International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics 1(3): 258-267.

[12] Jackson, S.L. (2015): Research Methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach. – Boston, USA: Cengage Learning 528p.

[13] Jafar, A., Dollah, R., Mittal, P., Idris, A., Kim, J.E., Abdullah, M.S., Joko, E.P., Tejuddin, D.N.A., Sakke, N., Zakaria, N.S. (2023): Readiness and challenges of E-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic era: A space analysis in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20(905): 1-15.

[14] Kamaludin, P.N.H., Yusof, S.M., Nawi, S.M., Nordin, N.A., Zabidin, N., Sain, N. (2022): Group online engagement: An analysis from Tuckman model. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12(9): 931-949.

[15] Kelly, A.E., Clinton-Lisell, V., Klein, K.A. (2022): Enhancing college students’ online group work perceptions and skills using a utility-value intervention. – Online Learning 26: 236-258.

[16] Koh, M.H., Hill, J.R. (2009): Student perceptions of groupwork in an online course: Benefits and challenges. – International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance 23(2): 69-92.

[17] Law, K.L.S., Kaur, H. (2025): Exploring the experiences and challenges of online learning at a private university in Malaysia. – International Journal of Management, Finance and Accounting 6(1): 277-307.

[18] Lu, H.S., Smiles, R. (2022): The role of collaborative learning in the online education. – International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research 6(6): 97-106.

[19] MacNeill, H., Telner, D., Sparaggis-Agaliotis, A., Hanna, E. (2014): All for one and one for all: Understanding health professionals’ experience in individual versus collaborative online learning. – Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 34(2): 102-111.

[20] Mitchell, A. (2021): Collaboration technology affordances from virtual collaboration in the time of COVID-19 and post-pandemic strategies. – Information Technology & People 36(5): 1982-2008.

[21] Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E.Y., Sunyono, Maulina, D., Nursafitri, L., Nurfaizal, N. (2024): Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. – Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 45(3): 803-814.

[22] Oyarzun, B., Martin, F., Young, S. (2023): A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration. – Online Learning 27(1): 71-106.

[23] Palloff, R.M., Pratt, K. (2010): Collaborating online: Learning together in community. – John Wiley & Sons 32: 128p.

[24] Petrides, L.A. (2002): Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. – International Journal of Instructional Media 29(1): 69-77.

[25] Siemens, G. (2005): Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. – International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning 2: 3-10.

[26] Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., Koh, M.H. (2004): Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. – The Internet and Higher Education 7(1): 59-70.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

INVESTIGATING GROUP WORK ONLINE THROUGH THEORY OF CONNECTIVISM. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(5), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i5.853