A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: MALAYSIA’S POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN ACADEMIC ENGLISH WRITING

Authors

  • XIDONG CHEN Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • GEETHANJALI NARAYANAN Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • NORIAH ISMAIL Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Johor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i4.786

Keywords:

academic English writing, coping strategies, Malaysia, postgraduate students

Abstract

This systematic literature review delves deeply into the intricate landscape of challenges and coping strategies in academic English writing among postgraduate students in Malaysia. Through an exhaustive search and meticulous analysis of a wide-range of empirical studies, this review uncovers the multifaceted nature of the obstacles faced by these students. Linguistic proficiency gaps, deeply rooted cultural and academic convention disparities, feelings of isolation, and the complex process of technological adaptation emerge as significant challenges. On the other hand, a variety of coping strategies, including well-designed institutional support systems, peer and supervisor support networks, the utilization of technological tools, innovative pedagogical interventions, and initiatives for cultural and linguistic adaptation, are identified and analyzed in detail. The review not only provides a comprehensive understanding of the current state of affairs but also highlights the need for more tailored, context-specific support systems that take into account both disciplinary and cultural nuances while upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. Based on the findings, practical recommendations for policy - makers, educators, and institutions are put forward to enhance the academic writing proficiency of postgraduate students in the Malaysian higher education context.

References

[1] Ahmed, K. (2018): Student perceptions of academic dishonesty in a private Middle Eastern university. – Higher Learning Research Communications 8(1): 16-29.

[2] Almatarneh, A.H.M., Ab Rashid, R., Yunus, K. (2018): The Academic Writing Experience of Jordanian Postgraduate Students at a University in Malaysia. – Arab World English Journal 9(3): 248-257.

[3] Chan, J.I.L., Suppiah, S., Chan, L. (2022): The post-pandemic challenge: Reimagining private higher education in Malaysia. – Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 26(2): 59-62.

[4] Driscoll, D.L., Yacoub, O. (2022): Threshold genres: A 10-year exploration of a medical writer’s development and social apprenticeship through the patient SOAP note. – Written Communication 39(3): 370-399.

[5] Foo, S.F., Richards, J.C. (2019): An investigation of the challenges encountered by Malay postgraduate students in academic English writing. – English Language Teaching 12(8): 15-24.

[6] Jeyaraj, J.J. (2020): Academic writing needs of postgraduate research students in Malaysia. – Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction 17(2): 1-23.

[7] Kotamjani, S.S., Samad, A.A., Fahimirad, M. (2018): International postgraduate students’ perception of challenges in academic writing in Malaysian public universities. – International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7(7): 191-195.

[8] Singh, M.K.M. (2015): International Graduate Students' Academic Writing Practices in Malaysia: Challenges and Solutions. – Journal of International Students 5(1): 12-22.

[9] Teng, L.W. (2018): English as a medium of instruction in Malaysian higher education: Stakeholder perceptions of policies and practices. – Asia Pacific Education Review 19(1): 79-91.

[10] Zhang, S.C., Hasim, Z. (2023): Perceptions and coping strategies in English writing among Chinese study-abroad graduate students. – SAGE Open 13(2): 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: MALAYSIA’S POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS’ CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES IN ACADEMIC ENGLISH WRITING. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(4), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i4.786