ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: ANALYTICAL EVIDENCE OF THE MEDIUM SIZED SMES

Authors

  • EZE KINGSLEY EZUMA Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.
  • CHIDINMA NWAMAKA OZUOMBA Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.
  • NNAMDI OGBODOAKUM Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.
  • CHIGOZIE EMMANUEL CHRISTOPHER Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.
  • EVELYN NWAMAKA OCHI AGBAJIOGU Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.
  • ULUNWA PHILIP NWATA Faculty of Management Sciences, University Of Agricultural Science and Environmental Sciences Umuaagwo, Imo State, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.720

Keywords:

human resource development, skills, organizational performance, small and medium enterprise

Abstract

Previous studies have consistently highlighted the use of both financial and non-final measurement in evaluating organizational performance in Human Resource Development (HRD). Moreover, evaluating organizational performance in the field of HRD using non-financial measures seems a daunting task. In this context, this study aims to ascertain the reliability and validity test on the adopted combined instruments to assist investigators in the field of professional development, research and education, in using non-financial measures. Based on reviewed literature, organizational performance in HRD framework were selected and built upon using the instrument past research studies. The combined instruments were then given to experts in HRD for validation of the content. Following recommendation of the content validity, 118 items were found valid out of the initial 250 items. These items were then subjected to a reliability test following a pilot study consisting of 50 owners of medium sized manufacturing SMEs. The Cronbach Alpha Test for the constructs ranges between 0.837 and .880 indicating the adequate internal consistency of the instruments. The validity of the questionnaire for the study is thus presumed. Furthermore, a significant correlation between the elements of the HRD perceived organizational performance questionnaire was found through analysis using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Overall, the results offered compelling evidence for the validity and reliability of the tool.

References

[1] Alagaraja, M., Cumberland, D.M., Choi, N. (2015): The mediating role of leadership and people management practices on HRD and organizational performance. – Human Resource Development International 18(3): 220-234.

[2] Anderson, J.C.J., Gerbing, D.D.W. (1988): Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. – Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411-423.

[3] Bartlett, K.R. (2001): The relationship between training and organizational commitment: A study in the health care field. – Human Resource Development Quarterly 12(4): 335-352.

[4] Bieker, T. (2003): Sustainability management with the Balanced Scorecard. – International Summer Academy of Technology Studies-Corporate Sustainability 20p.

[5] Chell, E. (2013): Review of skill and the entrepreneurial process. – International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 19(1): 6-31.

[6] Crucke, S., Decramer, A. (2016): The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises. – Sustainability 8(2): 18p.

[7] Drost, E.A. (2011): Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. – Education Research and Perspectives 38(1) 105-123.

[8] Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M. (2002): The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. – Business Strategy and the Environment 11(5): 269-284.

[9] George, D., Mallery, P. (2010): SPSS for Windows Step by Step: Answers to Selected Exercises: A Simple Guide and Reference. – Pearson/Allyn & Bacon 400p.

[10] Hosseini, Z., Kamal, A. (2012): Questionnaire to Measure Perceived Technology Integration Knowledge of Teachers ( TPCK ). – IJITCS Journal 3p.

[11] Hammarberg, T. (1990): The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child-and how to make it work. – Human Rights Quarterly 12(1): 97-105.

[12] Isaga, N., Masurel, E., van Montfort, C.A.G.M. (2015): Owner‑manager motives and the growth of SMEs in developing countries: Evidence from the furniture industry in Tanzania. – Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies 7(3): 190-211.

[13] Katou, A.A. (2008): The impact of human resource development on organisational performance: Test of a causal model. – Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 9(2): 237-252

[14] Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (2007): Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. – Harvard Business Review 85(7/8): 150-161.

[15] Kimberlin, C.L., Winterstein, A G. (2008): Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. – American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 65(23): 2276-2284.

[16] Kothari, C.R. (2004): Research methodology: Methods and techniques. – New Age International 401p.

[17] McLagan, P.A. (1989): Models for HRD practice. – Training & Development Journal 43(9): 49-60.

[18] Mumford, T.V., Campion, M.A., Morgeson, F.P. (2007): The Leadership Skills Strataplex: Leadership Skill Requirements Across Organizational Levels. – Leadership Quarterly 18: 154-166.

[19] Ogunyomi, P., Bruning, N.S. (2016): Human resource management and organizational performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria. – International Journal of Human Resource Management 27(5-6): 612-634.

[20] Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Daniel, L.G., Collins, K.M.T. (2009): A meta-validation model for assessing the score-validity of student teaching evaluations. – Quality and Quantity 43(2): 197-209.

[21] Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I.F., Johnston, W.J. (2002): Measuring network competence: some international evidence. – Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 17(2/3): 119-138.

[22] Sung, S.Y., Choi, J.N. (2014): Multiple dimensions of human resource development and organizational performance. – Journal of Organizational Behavior 35(November): 851-887.

[23] Swanson, R.A., Holton, E.F. (2010): Foundations of Human Resource Development. – Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. 432p.

[24] Torkkeli, L., Kuivalainen, O., Saarenketo, S., Puumalainen, K. (2016): Network competence in Finnish SMEs : implications for growth. – Baltic Journal of Management 11(2): 207-230.

[25] Torkkeli, L., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., Kuivalainen, O. (2012): The effect of network competence and environmental hostility on the internationalization of SMEs. – Journal of International Entrepreneurship 10(1): 25-49.

[26] Torraco, R.J. (1999): Advancing Our Understanding of Performance Improvement. – Advancies in Developing Human Resouces 1(4): 95-111.

[27] Yahaya, T.A.B., Idris, K., Suandi, T., Ismail, I.A. (2018): Adapting instruments and modifying statements: The confirmation method for the inventory and model for information sharing behavior using social media. – Management Science Letters 8: 271-282.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: ANALYTICAL EVIDENCE OF THE MEDIUM SIZED SMES. (2025). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 576-589. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.720