ONLINE COLLABORATIVE SKETCH-STORMING APPROACH IN CONTEMPORARY TEXTILE DESIGN MOTIF DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.651Keywords:
online collaborative, ideation, team creativity, creative tools, textile designAbstract
The practice of textile design mostly depends on personal sketches, which produces repetitive motif variations instead of new creative ideas. Researcher explored the effectiveness of sketch-storming activities conducted online for developing creative textile motifs. The experimental session assembled 60 textile design students to carry out virtual sketch collaboration with digital software. Researchers analyzed the motifs through both qualitative and quantitative assessments based on their quantity and variety as well as novelty. Online collaborative sketching produces better creative results because it generates more original unique motifs than working individually on sketches. Students confirmed that working together in this environment triggered creativity because it fostered both shared inspirations along with continuous exchange of innovative ideas. The research demonstrated that live collaborative work combined with software version management and quick operational tools creates the perfect conditions for enhancing creative work. The study highlights important features which boost creative performances through real-time evaluation feedback as well as the opportunity to take risks and utilize iterative designing systems. Research findings demonstrate that educational and industrial applications of online sketching collaboration mechanisms will fuel disruptive motif development. This research enriches the digital ideation tool investigation by showing their capacity to advance creative result production while revolutionizing the textile industry design methods.
References
[1] Abd Manan, M.S., Kennedy, B. (2022): Exploring sketches as conceptual data: a semiological experiment on moods visualisation among architectural students. – Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 16(1): 203-221.
[2] Amabile, T.M. (1982): Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(5): 997-1013.
[3] Besemer, S.P., Treffinger, D.J. (1981): Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis. – The Journal of Creative Behavior 15(3): 158-178.
[4] Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P., Eris, O. (2016): Inflection moments in design discourse: How questions drive problem framing during idea generation. – Design Studies 46: 59-78.
[5] Chandrasegaran, S., Badam, S.K., Zhao, Z., Elmqvist, N., Kisselburgh, L., Ramani, K. (2014): Collaborative sketching with skWiki: a case study. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers 46407: 10p.
[6] Corneli, J., Jordanous, A. (2015): Implementing feedback in creative systems: A workshop approach. – ArXiv Preprint 11p.
[7] Coulter, J. (2018): The designers leap: boundary jumping to foster interdisciplinarity between textile design and science. – Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice 6(2): 137-162.
[8] Cusano, C., Napoletano, P. (2017): Visual recognition of aircraft mechanical parts for smart maintenance. – Computers in Industry 86: 26-33.
[9] Daiber, F., Li, L., Krüger, A. (2012): Designing gestures for mobile 3D gaming. – In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia 4p.
[10] Dam, R.F., Siang, T.Y. (2019): Introduction to the essential ideation techniques which are the heart of design thinking. – Interaction Design Foundation 1p.
[11] Dorta, T., Lesage, A., Pérez, E. (2009): Design tools and collaborative ideation. – Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions: CAADFutures 15p.
[12] Eckert, J. (2018): Leading the conversation-why design education should care more about leadership and stewardship in design. – Cumulus Paris 13p.
[13] Elsen, C., Demaret, J.N., Yang, M.C., Leclercq, P. (2012): Sketch-based interfaces for modeling and users' needs: Redefining connections. – AI EDAM 26(3): 281-301.
[14] Gong, Y., Kim, T.Y., Lee, D.R., Zhu, J. (2013): A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. – Academy of Management Journal 56(3): 827-851.
[15] Härkki, T., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Hakkarainen, K. (2018): Line by line, part by part: collaborative sketching for designing. – International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28: 471-494.
[16] Heimdal, E., Rosenqvist, T. (2012): Three roles for textiles as tangible working materials in co-designprocesses. – CoDesign 8(2-3): 183-195.
[17] Heimdal, E., Rosenqvist, T. (2010): Textiles as tangible working materials in participatory design processes: potentials and challenges. – In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference 4p.
[18] Hosseini, M., Shahri, A., Phalp, K., Taylor, J., Ali, R. (2015): Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study. – Computer Science Review 17: 43-69.
[19] Jimenez Moreno, E. (2022): Study of the possibilities of 3D-printing for Footwear design and development of models for this new market.: Studie av möjligheterna med 3D-printing för Skodesign och utveckling av modeller för denna nya marknad. – Joinkoping University 98p.
[20] Jordan, A., Selway, M., Grossmann, G., Mayer, W., Stumptner, M. (2015): Ontology-based process modelling for design. – In Design Computing and Cognition'14, Springer International Publishing 18p.
[21] Joundi, J., Christiaens, Y., Saldien, J., Conradie, P., De Marez, L. (2020): An explorative study towards using VR sketching as a tool for ideation and prototyping in product design. – In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Cambridge University Press 1: 225-234.
[22] Lee, M.H. (2020): User-adaptive data visualization in daily context through everyday objects. – Archives of Design Research 33(1): 5-15.
[23] Li, A., Lu, Y., Song, N., Zhang, S., Ma, L., Lan, Z. (2024): Understanding the Therapeutic Relationship between Counselors and Clients in Online Text-based Counseling using LLMs. – ArXiv Preprint 24p.
[24] Liu, C.Y., Wu, C.J. (2022): STEM without art: A ship without a sail. – Thinking Skills and Creativity 43: 12p.
[25] Nghiem, C.M.G., Bousseau, A., Sypesteyn, M., Hoftijzer, J., Tsandilas, T. (2024): Sketch Presentation for Product Design. – In Proceedings of the 35th International Francophone Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 4p.
[26] Pfister, R.A., Eppler, M.J. (2012): The benefits of sketching for knowledge management. – Journal of Knowledge Management 16(2): 372-382.
[27] Runco, M.A., Jaeger, G.J. (2012): The standard definition of creativity. – Creativity Research Journal 24(1): 92-96.
[28] Soygenis, S., Soygenis, M., Erktin, E. (2010): Writing as a tool in teaching sketching: Implications for architectural design education. – International Journal of Art & Design Education 29(3): 283-293.
[29] Velloso, L.M.R., de Carvalho, M.F., Araújo, G.M., Jarske, J.M., Garcia, L.A., de Souza, L.S., Ito, M., Alves-Souza, S.N., dos Santos, T.L., Fernandes, H.M., Filgueiras, L.V.L. (2023): Contributions of remote collaborative sketching to the design of infovis in public health. – InfoDesign-Journal of Information Design 20(1): 21p.
[30] Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Mast, F.W. (2010): Immersion in mediated environments: The role of personality traits. – Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13(3): 251-256.
[31] Wu, Y., Koutstaal, W. (2022): Creative flexibility and creative persistence: Evaluating the effects of instructed vs autonomous choices to shift vs. dwell on divergent and convergent thinking. – Consciousness and Cognition 105: 18p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RAINAL HIDAYAT WARDI, MAITHREYI SUBRAMANIAM, RUSMAWATI GHAZALI, RAHMAN ROSMAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
