CHILD’S CUSTODY AFTER DIVORCE: HARMONISATION BETWEEN ISLAMIC AND CIVIL LAWS IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • AKBAR KAMARUDIN @ ABDUL SHUKOR Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i6.508

Keywords:

sole custody, joint custody, best interest of the child, best interest’s factors, custody, access

Abstract

Malaysia practises diverse child’s custody after divorce law. Islamic law binds Muslims and non-Muslims are bound by Civil law. Both laws recognise the best interest of the child as the main consideration in custody. The Shari’ah and Civil courts will use the best interest’s factors to determine custody. However, the laws in Malaysia have remained stagnant for the past 30 years. It is therefore important for the laws to undergo legal reforms. Legal reforms should consider harmonisation because the laws share many similar values. They can complement each other to strengthen custody. This article examines the laws and legal reforms through harmonisation in the best interest and the factors. The results show the possibility of the reforms through harmonisation. The laws should recognise joint and sole custody. The best interest should prioritise the child without neglecting the role of the parents, the family members, and the related parties. The factors should be flexible. The courts should also consider other relevant factors to determine custody.

References

Al-Asyqar, U.S. (1982): Tarikh al-Fiqh al-Islami. – Kuwait: Maktabah al-Falah 136p.

Ali, S.A. (1965): Mohammedan Law: The law relating to succession and status. – All Pakistan Legal Decisions 640p.

Al-Kasani, A.U.A.B., Ibn Mas’ud, B. (1986): Bada’i al-Sana’i fi Tartib al-Shara'i. – Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah 5: 185p.

Al-Khin, M., al-Bakri, Z.M., al-Bugha, M., Al-Syarbaji, A. (2011): al-Fiqh al-manhaji: Mazhab al-Syafie. – Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM) 494p.

Al-Marghinani, B. (2000): Al-Hidayah: Sharh Bidayat al-Mubtadi. – Pakistan: MaktabahRashidiyyah 1560p.

Al-Tantawi, M.M., Muhammad, M. (1987): Al-madkhal ila’l-fiqh al-Islami tarikh al-tashri’wa masadiruhu wa’l-nazariyyat al-fiqhiyyah. – Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah 348p.

Al-Zuhayli, W. (2004): Al-fiqh al-Islami wa adillatuhu. – Damascus: Dar al-Fikr 45p.

Bozzomo, J.W. (2002): Joint Legal Custody: A Parent's Constitutional Right in a Reorganized Family. – Hofstra Law Review 31(2): 547-585.

Bond, T., Black, J.M., Bridge, J. (2008): Family Law 2008. – Oxford University Press, USA 640p.

Coltrane, S., Collins, R. (2001): Sociology of marriage & the family: Gender, love, and property. – Cengage Learning 656p.

Cornish, W.R., Clark, G.N. (1989): Law and society in England 1750-1950. – London: Sweet & Maxwell 690p.

Cracknell, D.G., Wilson, C.H. (1990): Roman Law: Origins and Influence. – HLT Publications 200p.

Diduck, A., Kaganas, F. (2000): Family law, gender and the state. – Bloomsbury Publishing 870p.

Douglas, G. (2004): An introduction to family law. – Oxford University Press 228p.

Edwards, J. (2006): Presumption of Shared Residence-a Conundrum for the Government or the Judiciary? – FAMILY LAW-BRISTOL 5p.

Gallo, N.R. (2004): Introduction to family law. – USA: Thomson 513p.

Harris, L.J., Carbone, J.R., Rebouché, R. (2023): Family law. – Aspen Publishing 846p.

Ibrahim, A. (1997): Family law in Malaysia. – Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. 401p.

Kamaruddin, Z. (2005): Divorce laws in Malaysia. – Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. 229p.

Kharofa, A. (2004): Islamic family law: A comparative study with other religions. – International Law Book Services 340p.

Lamanna, M.A., Riedmann, A.C. (2003): Marriages and families: Making choices in a diverse society. – Wadsworth Publishing 700p.

Lauer, R.H., Lauer, J.C. (1991): The quest for intimacy. – Wm. C. Brown Publishers 619p.

Majid, M.K. (1999): Family law in Malaysia. – Malaysian Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. 413p.

Masson, J.M., Bailey-Harris, R., Probert, R. (2008): Cretney's Principles of Family Law. – Sweet & Maxwell 917p.

McKenzie, P.A. (2006): Nowhere to Run: Custody, Relocation, and Domestic Violence in Florida. – Nova Law Review 31(2): 355-374.

Najdi, U.A. (1989): Hidayat al-Raghib li Sharh ‘Umdat al-Talib. – Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia 1274p.

Nasir, J.J. (Ed.) (1990): The Islamic law of personal status. – Brill Archive 272p.

Parkinson, P. (2006): Decision-making about the best interests of the child: The impact of the two tiers. – Australian Journal of Family Law 20(2): 179-192.

Randawar, D.K., Kamarudin, A., Shukor, A. (2020): Non-Parental Child Custody Rights: A Comparative Perspective. – Intellectual Discourse 28(2): 529-553.

Randawar, D.K., Rahmat, N.E. (2018): Akbar Kamarudin@ Abdul Shukor. – Family Law in Malaysia, Malaysia: Lexis-Nexis 300p.

Samarah, M. (2002): Ahkam wa athar al-zawjiyyah. – Jordan, Al-Dar al-Ilmiyyah al-Dawliyyah 273p.

Sayis, M.A. (2006): Tarikh al-Fiqh al-Islami. – Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyah 159p.

Shannon, G. (Ed.) (2011): Family law. – Oxford University Press, USA 366p.

Spon-Smith, R. (2004): Relocation Revisited. – FAMILY LAW-BRISTOL 34: 191-198.

Wragg, T. (1998): Family law. – London: Pitman Publishing 152p.

Zaydān, A.A.K. (1993): Al-Mufaṣṣal fī Aḥkām al-Mar’ah wa Bayt al-Muslim fī al-Sharī’ah al-Islāmiyyah. – Beirut: Mu’assat al-Risalah 522p.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHILD’S CUSTODY AFTER DIVORCE: HARMONISATION BETWEEN ISLAMIC AND CIVIL LAWS IN MALAYSIA. (2024). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(6), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i6.508