SOCIAL MEDIA AS MEDIATOR IN CRISIS COMMUNICATION AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT DURING MALAYSIA’S COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors

  • SITI SALBIAH NORAZAN Faculty of Mass Communication & Media Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • SUHAIMEE SAAHAR @ SAABAR Faculty of Mass Communication & Media Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.
  • WARDATUL HAYAT ADNAN Faculty of Mass Communication & Media Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i5.431

Keywords:

social media, mediating factors, crisis communication, reputation management, Malaysia

Abstract

Crisis communication played a crucial role in Malaysia's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, bridging public health and political discourse. Media competition intensified, shaping public perception through various social media strategies. This led to diverse political leanings and impacts on public understanding, sometimes causing pandemic-related misunderstandings. Despite this, the pandemic also fueled an "infodemic," spreading misinformation and overshadowing factual content. Thus, the study's main aims are to analyse the role of social media as the mediating factors on crises communication and reputation management. The quantitative method will be used to achieve the study's purpose by using a proportionate stratified random sampling technique and distributing the survey to 400 Malaysians. The mean analysis on social media is 3.35. The mediation analysis valuing p=0.92, p=0.91, p=0.89, p=0.89, p=0.87, p=0.77, p=0.77, p=0.76, p=0.73, p=0.69, p=0.44, p=0.43, p=0.30, p=0.23, p=0.09. These research findings indicate that the indirect effect hypotheses are not supported. In this critical situation, crisis communication strategies may have a more direct impact, not always relying on media. Social media's role in shaping public perception could be less important compared to government actions, personal experiences, and traditional media. The complexity of crises like COVID-19 involves many variables and stakeholders, which might lessen the impact of social media. The effectiveness of policies could be more influential than how they're communicated through social media. Varying levels of media literacy and how people consume information on social media could weaken the effects, leading to inconsistent results in studies.

References

Azlan, A.A., Hamzah, M.R., Sern, T.J., Ayub, S.H., Mohamad, E. (2020): Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. – Plos One 15(5): 15p.

Benoit, W.L. (1997): Image repair discourse and crisis communication. – Public Relations Review 23(2): 177-186.

Böcker, J. (2024): An Ethical and Moral Approach: The Way of Apology. – In Reappraising Legal, Political and Ethical Questions Concerning the Herero and Nama Genocide, Brill Nijhoff 11p.

Coombs, W.T. (2007): Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. – Corporate Reputation Review 10: 163-176.

Coombs, W.T., Holladay, S.J. (2008): Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology's role and value in crisis communication. – Public Relations Review 34(3): 252-257.

Coombs, W.T., Laufer, D. (2018): Global crisis management–current research and future directions. – Journal of International Management 24(3): 199-203.

Gasana, K. (2024): Crisis Communication and Reputation Management in the Age of Fake News. – Journal of Public Relations 3(1): 28-39.

Herkert, J., Borenstein, J., Miller, K. (2020): The Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for engineering ethics. – Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 2957-2974.

Hwang, I., Park, K., Kim, T.E., Kwon, Y., Lee, Y.K. (2021): COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring in Republic of Korea from February 26, 2021 to October 31, 2021. – Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 12(6): 7p.

Kim, S., Austin, L., Liu, B.F., Jin, Y. (2022): Exploring differences in crisis literacy and efficacy on behavioral responses during infectious disease outbreaks. – Public Relations Review 48(3): 13p.

Kim, S., Liu, B.F. (2012): Are all crises opportunities? A comparison of how corporate and government organizations responded to the 2009 flu pandemic. – Journal of Public Relations Research 24(1): 69-85.

Liao, C.H. (2023): Exploring the Influence of Public Perception of Mass Media Usage and Attitudes towards Mass Media News on Altruistic Behavior. – Behavioral Sciences 13(8): 22p.

Marwick, A.E., Boyd, D. (2011): I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. – New Media & Society 13(1): 114-133.

Masngut, N., Mohamad, E. (2021): Association between public opinion and Malaysian government communication strategies about the COVID-19 crisis: content analysis of image repair strategies in social media. – Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(8): 9p.

Memon, M.A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., Cham, T.H. (2020): Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. – Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling 4(2): 1-20.

Ow Yong, L.M., Xin, X., Wee, J.M.L., Poopalalingam, R., Kwek, K.Y.C., Thumboo, J. (2020): Perception survey of crisis and emergency risk communication in an acute hospital in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. – BMC Public Health 20: 1-12.

Pang, A., Jin, Y., Cameron, G.T. (2023): The contingency theory of strategic conflict management: Review from three decades of theory development, extension, and application. – Journalism & Communication Monographs 25(2): 193-214.

Pascarella, G., Rossi, M., Montella, E., Capasso, A., De Feo, G., Botti, G., Nardone, A., Montuori, P., Triassi, M., D’Auria, S., Morabito, A. (2021): Risk analysis in healthcare organizations: Methodological framework and critical variables. – Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 15p.

Roussin, A., Frederick, E., Pegoraro, A. (2022): Social media, crisis, and college sport: An analysis of three crises. – Journal of Sports Media 17(2): 25-54.

Seeger, M.W., Schwarz, A. (2024): DISASTER COMMUNICATION. – Routledge Handbook of Risk, Crisis, and Disaster Communication 424p.

Suzuki, M., Jenkins, T. (2022): The role of (self-) forgiveness in restorative justice: Linking restorative justice to desistance. – European Journal of Criminology 19(2): 202-219.

Viererbl, B., Denner, N., Holzer, S. (2024): So Close, Yet So Far? Effects of Privatisation and Communicative Strategy on the Perceptions of Stakeholders in Corporate Crises. – In Communication in Uncertain Times, Emerald Publishing Limited 7: 127-144.

Wang, Y., Cheng, Y., Sun, J. (2021): When public relations meets social media: A systematic review of social media related public relations research from 2006 to 2020. – Public Relations Review 47(4): 25p.

Wong-Parodi, G., Relihan, D.P., Garfin, D.R. (2024): A longitudinal investigation of risk perceptions and adaptation behavior in the US Gulf Coast. – PNAS Nexus 3(4): 12p.

Yamamoto, K., Kimura, M., Osaka, M. (2021): Sorry, not sorry: Effects of different types of apologies and self-monitoring on non-verbal behaviors. – Frontiers in Psychology 12: 10p.

Zheng, Q. (2023): Restoring trust through transparency: Examining the effects of transparency strategies on police crisis communication in Mainland China. – Public Relations Review 49(2): 14p.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SOCIAL MEDIA AS MEDIATOR IN CRISIS COMMUNICATION AND REPUTATION MANAGEMENT DURING MALAYSIA’S COVID-19 PANDEMIC. (2024). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(5), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i5.431