BEYOND VEILS: AN IPA STUDY OF FILIPINO MUSLIM WOMEN’S BODY NARRATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i2.351Keywords:
Filipino Muslims, female body, autonomy, identity, body narrativesAbstract
Guided by Feminist Standpoint Theory and Intersectionality, this study is dedicated to unveiling the body narratives of Filipino Muslim women or 'Muslimahs' and creates a space for a critical reflection on societal constructs that shape the perception of their bodies. Through the draw-talk process, participants were encouraged to visually and verbally articulate their perceptions of the female Muslim body according to religious teachings and cultural ideologies, as well as their contemporary interpretations and experiences - Bridging the gap between traditional Islamic teachings, cultural beliefs, and contemporary experiences of Muslimahs. Employing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), the research unveils seven themes: 'A Muslimah is Covered,' 'A Muslimah is Protected and Esteemed,' 'A Muslimah is Modest and Clean,' 'A Muslimah is Nurturing,' 'Expressing Individuality,' 'Challenges of Being a Minority,' and 'Not Oppressed, but Actually Empowered.' The first four themes address traditional narratives rooted in cultural and religious norms, emphasizing modesty, protection, and nurturing roles within the Muslim community. The subsequent three themes delve into contemporary experiences, including the expression of individuality, challenges faced by religious and cultural minorities, and assertions of empowerment and freedom derived from faith. This study opens opportunities for a broader discourse on body construct, identity, and tradition-modernity interactions, standing against stereotypes and calling for a more inclusive and accepting society. It challenges preconceived notions and recognizes the diverse agency and autonomy of Muslimahs in shaping their narratives.
References
Abdul-Wahid, A.K. (2022): Hadeeth 7: Be gentle with women. They are like fragile vessels-Understanding femininity in Islam. – ABUKHADEEJAH Web Portal 4p.
Abunab, H.Y., Dator, W.L., Salvador, J.T., Lacanaria, M.G. (2017): Solitude, religious and cultural uniqueness in a foreign environment: Adjustments as an Arab student. – Journal of Religion and Health 56(5): 1701-1718.
Ahmad, H.M. (2018): The High Status of Women in Islam. – The Official Website of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community 8p.
Amado, L.E. (2004): Sexual and bodily rights as human rights in the Middle East and North Africa. – Reproductive Health Matters 12(23): 125-128.
Bangsamoro Information Office (BIO) (2023): Hijab: A symbol of modesty and empowerment for Muslim women. – Philippine Information Agency 5p.
Barkatulla, F. (2021): Does Islam need feminism? – Muslim Central Web Portal 50p.
Behardien, T. (2022): "I'm not going to let the patriarch stop me!": Examining the Obsession with Muslim Women's Bodies, Voices and Veils in Cinema, Television & Popular Culture. – University of Cape Town 48p.
Boden, Z., Larkin, M., Iyer, M. (2018): Picturing ourselves in the world: Drawings, interpretative phenomenological analysis, and the relational mapping interview. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 16(2): 218-236.
Borchert, J.W. (2018): Honors 240: How religion makes bodies: Saints, cyborgs, monsters. – Humanities Commons Web Portal 5p.
Britannica Web Portal (2023): Hijab-Islam. – Britannica Web Portal 1p.
Caldwell, C.M. (2016): Body identity development: Definitions and discussions. – Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 11(4): 220-234.
Crenshaw, K. (2021): Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. – University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989(1): 31p.
Eatough, V., Smith, J.A. (2017): Interpretative phenomenological analysis. – The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology 13p.
Feldman, R., Clark, K. (1996): Women, religious fundamentalism and reproductive rights. – Reproductive Health Matters 4(8): 12-20.
Harding, S. (2004): A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory's controversality. – Feminist Science Studies 19(1): 25-47.
Heavey, E. (2015): Narrative bodies, embodied narratives. – The Handbook of Narrative Analysis 17p.
Heu, L.C. (2023): The Loneliness of the Odd One Out How deviations from social norms can help explain loneliness across cultures. – Perspectives on Psychological Science 58p.
Ho, C., Schraner, J. (2004): Feminist standpoints, knowledge and truth: A literature review. – School of Economics and Finance Working Paper Series, Sydney: University of Western Sydney 26p.
Huassain, S. (2017): Gender and sexuality in islam: An interface of patriarchy, religion and customary practices. – Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 5(5): 310-315.
Huss, E., Cwikel, J. (2005): Researching Creations: Applying Arts-Based Research to Bedouin Women's Drawings Ephrat Huss and Julie Cwikel. – International Journal of Qualitative Methods 4(4): 44-62.
Hustvedt, S. (2006): Mysteries of the rectangle: Essays on painting. – Princeton Architectural Press 202p.
Kasulis, T.P., Ames, R.T., Dissanayake, W. (1993): Self as body in Asian theory and practice. – State University of New York Press 383p.
Khan, M. (2019): Muslim feminist activists discuss faith, feminism, and changing negative stereotypes. – Newsweek Web Portal 5p.
Killoran, R. (2011): Gendered Secularization and the Body Policing of Muslim Women. – In Inquiry@ Queen's Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings 3p.
Kokushkin, M. (2014): Standpoint theory is dead. Long live standpoint theory! Why should standpoint thinking be embraced by scholars who do not identify as feminists? – Journal of Arts and Humanities 3(7): 8-20.
Kusuma, D.K., Asror, F.M. (2022): FEMINIST STANDPOINT THEORY: an Analysis of Muslims Women Interaction in SHAFINA Ummida Jogokariyan. – PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender 15(1): 25-42.
Laderman, G., León, L.D. (2003): Religion and American cultures: An Encyclopedia of Traditions. – USA: ABC-CLIO, Inc. 1046p.
Lazreg, M. (2009): Questioning the veil: Open letters to Muslim women. – Princeton University Press 168p.
Malchiodi, C.A. (2005): Expressive therapies: History, theory, and practice. – Expressive Therapies 15p.
Mason, J., May, T. (2002): Qualitative interviewing: asking, listening and intepreting. – In Qualitative Research in Action, Sage Publications Ltd. 22p.
McCulliss, D. (2017): Body narrative: Write the story of your body. – Eckleburg Web Portal 6p.
Medina, J. (2014): This battlefield called my body: Warring over the Muslim female. – Religions 5(3): 876-885.
Moghadam, V.M. (2002): Islamic feminism and its discontents: Toward a resolution of the debate. – Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 27(4): 1135-1171.
Mohanty, C.T., Torres, L. (Eds.) (1991): Third world women and the politics of feminism. – Indiana University Press 632: 352p.
Nikolopoulou, K. (2022): What is purposive sampling? – Scribbr Web Portal 16p.
Noy, C. (2008): Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in qualitative research. – International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11(4): 327-344.
Obermeyer, C.M. (1994): Reproductive choice in Islam: gender and state in Iran and Tunisia. – Studies in Family Planning 25(1): 41-51.
Omrani, S. (2020): Muslim woman: heavenly body, communal autonomy. – U.W. Tacoma Digital 12p.
Patoari, M.H. (2019): The rights of women in Islam and some misconceptions: An analysis from Bangladesh perspective. – Beijing Law Review 10(05): 1211-1224.
Ramírez, Á. (2018): Control over female ‘Muslim’bodies: culture, politics and dress code laws in some Muslim and non-Muslim countries. – In Interrogating Intersectionalities, Gendering Mobilities, Racializing Transnationalism, Routledge 15p.
Richardson, J.G. (1986): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. – Greenwood 401p.
Rolin, K. (2009): Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations. – Hypatia 24(4): 218-226.
Sclater, D. (2003): The arts and narrative research. – Qualitative Inquiry 9(4): 621-625.
Scottish Government (2022): Using Intersectionality to understand structural inequality in Scotland: evidence synthesis. Scottish Government Web Portal 9p.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., Larkin, M. (2009): Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 6(4): 346-347.
Uwujaren, J., Utt, J. (2015): Why our feminism must be intersectional (and 3 ways to practice it). – Everyday Feminism Web Portal 11: 28p
Wadud, A. (2021): Reflections on islamic feminist exegesis of the qur’an. – Religions 12(7): 11p.
Wadud, A. (2019): The first American woman, Imam, explains the rise of Islamic feminism. – VICE MEDIA GROUP Web Portal 62p.
Wadud, A. (2015): Islam, Feminism and Human Rights. – Leiden University 50p.
Woodley, X.M., Lockard, M. (2016): Womanism and snowball sampling: Engaging marginalized populations in holistic research. – The Qualitative Report 21(2): 321-329.