DIGITAL DIVIDES IN CHINESE HE: LEVERAGING AI AS STUDENT’S PARTNER (AIASSP) TO REDUCE PIRACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v5i1.343Keywords:
student engagement, AI, lived experience, higher education, digital piracyAbstract
This article explores the educational significance of the closure of Z-library, an online platform enabling digital book piracy, through qualitative research with 103 postgraduates in a Sino-British Higher Education Institute (HEI) in China. Analysis found students viewed digital piracy as a tool to expedite academic practice and were weighed the criminal implications of the platform carefully. Consequently, the article suggests that universities need to consider further socioeconomically disadvantaged students alongside library resourcing and digital skills training. It recommends Artificial Intelligence (AI) and an ‘AI as Students Partners (AIasSP)’ philosophy as a solution to reduce student reliance on digital piracy. The article, therefore, highlights the potential of AI for improving skills-based study, administration, and improving the quality of the student experience. However, it concludes by discussing the ethical and privacy concerns raised by such an approach in Higher Education (HE), stressing the need for a multidisciplinary view of responsible AI as reshaping literacy and information retrieval practices across a process of lifelong learning.
References
Aronson, J. (1994): A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. – The Qualitative Report 2(1): 1-3.
Belleflamme, P., Peitz, M. (2013): Digital piracy: An update. – Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(2): 3-22.
Ash, A. (2016): Is China’s gaokaothe world’s toughest school exam? – The Guardian Official Portal 22p.
Banks, K. (2023): How can academic libraries use AI to improve their services. – PressReader Official Portal 12p.
Bello, A. (2023): Z-Library’s Closure Raises Tough Questions About Access. – Inkstick Official Portal 11p.
Belleflamme, P., Peitz, M. (2013): Digital piracy: An update. – Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(2): 3-22.
Boyatzis, R.E. (1998): Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. – Sage Publication 200p.
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006): Using thematic analysis in psychology. – Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77-101.
Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (Eds.) (2007): The Sage handbook of grounded theory. – Sage 656p.
Buckwell, A. (2023): Everything you need to know about the Z-Library shutdown. – Acer Official Portal 6p.
Chen, L. (2020): A historical review of professional learning communities in China (1949-2019): Some implications for collaborative teacher professional development. – Asia Pacific Journal of Education 40(1): 1-14.
Chou, C. (2011): Teachers' professional development: Investigating teachers' learning to do action research in a professional learning community. – The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 20(1): 1-13.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., Felten, P. (2014): Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. – International Journal for Academic Development 19(1): 1-3.
Day, M.J., Carr, L., Halford, S. (2015): Developing the'Pro-human'Web. – In Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference 10p.
Day, M.J., Skulsuthavong, M. (2022): Turbulence in Thailand? The Thai digital civil rights movement and a ‘pro-human’contract for the web. – In Social Transformations in India, Myanmar, and Thailand: Volume II: Identity and Grassroots for Democratic Progress, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore 27p.
Day, M.J., Skulsuthavong, M. (2021a): Towards social transformation in Thailand: Orwellian power struggles and ‘digital’human rights under the socio-technical Thai internet panopticon. – Social Transformations in India, Myanmar, and Thailand: Volume I: Social, Political and Ecological Perspectives 32p.
Day, M.J., Skulsuthavong, M. (2021b): Newton’s socio-technical cradle? Web science, the weaponisation of social media, hashtag activism and Thailand's postcolonial pendulum. – JOMEC Journal 16: 100-129.
Fidel, R., Davies, R.K., Douglass, M.H., Holder, J.K., Hopkins, C.J., Kushner, E.J., Miyagishima, B.K., Toney, C.D. (1999): A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. – Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(1): 24-37.
Gatlan, S. (2023): Z-Library eBook site disrupted again by FBI domain seizures. – Bleeping Computer Official Portal 12p.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L. (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. – Aldine de Gruyter 282p.
Head, A.J., Eisenberg, M.B. (2010): How college students use the web to conduct everyday life research. – First Monday 15(4): 26p.
Healey, M., Flint, A., Harrington, K. (2021): Investigating students' experiences of Students as Partners (SaP) for basic need fulfilment: A self-determination theory perspective. – Teaching in Higher Education 26(3): 284-300.
Howlett, Z.M., Khanna, T., Szonyi, M. (2022): The National College Entrance Examination and the myth of meritocracy in post-Mao China. – In Making Meritocracy: Lessons from China and India, from Antiquity to the Present 392p.
Hu, Y., Jing, X., Yang, Y. (2022): Factors Impacting the Sustainable Development of Professional Learning Communities in Interdisciplinary Subjects in Chinese K-12 Schools: A Case Study. – Sustainability 14(21): 16p.
Kaur, A., Noman, M. (2020): Investigating students’ experiences of Students as Partners (SaP) for basic need fulfilment: A self-determination theory perspective. – Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 17(1): 13p.
Kimmons, R., Veletsianos, G. (2018): Education scholars’ evolving uses of Twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. – British Journal of Educational Technology 49(3): 445-464.
King, G., Pan, J., Roberts, M.E. (2013): How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. – American Political Science Review 107(2): 326-343.
Kuo, L. (2013): China’s brutal entrance examination about to get a little more fair. – The Atlantic Official Portal 4p.
LaFraniere, S. (2009): China’s college entry test is an obsession. – The New York Times Official Portal 3p.
Lakkaraju, A. (2022): Textbook Piracy is Morally Justified. – The Daily Illini Official Portal 5p.
Lorentzen, P. (2014): China’s strategic censorship. – American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 402-414.
McNiff, J. (2017): Action research: All you need to know. – Action Research 288p.
Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S.L., Matthews, K.E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., Swaim, K. (2017): A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. – International Journal for Students as Partners 1(1): 15-37.
Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J. (2017): Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. – International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 13p.
Osterman, K.F., Kottkamp, R.B. (1993): Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. – Corwin Press 20p.
Patton, M.Q. (1990): Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. – Sage Publication 832p.
Perry, E.J. (2020): Educated acquiescence: How academia sustains authoritarianism in China. – Theory and Society 49(1): 1-22.
Saleh, F., Bista, K. (2017): The Digital Divide: A Social Justice Issue of the 21st Century. – Journal of Education and Social Policy 4(3): 1-9.
Shou, Z. (2021): Gaokao scheduled for June 7-8 this year. – China Daily Official Portal 5p.
Soberman, D. (2014): Essays on the economics of digital piracy. – Journal of Marketing Research 51(4): 469-480.
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998): Basics of qualitative research techniques. – SAGE Publication 456p.
Stringer, E.T. (2008): Action research in education. – Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall 248p.
Suber, P. (2004): The case for open access to research and scholarship. – The Journal of Academic Librarianship 30(5): 365-368.
Tai, Y., Fu, K. (2020): Specificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China. – Journalism & Communication Monographs 22(1): 5-47.
Tiezzi, S. (2014): The Gaokao exam: A tough test for China. – The Diplomat Official Portal 6p.
Van Dijk, J.A. (2006): Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. – Poetics 34(4-5): 221-235.
Warschauer, M., Matuchniak, T. (2010): New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. – Review of Research in Education 34(1): 179-225.
Waters, T., Day, M.J. (2022a): Thai menschenbild: a study of Chinese, Thai, and international students in a private Thai university as measured by the national survey of student engagement (NSSE). – Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9(1): 1-12.
Waters, T., Day, M.J. (2022b): Multicultural mosaic? studying the cultural integration of international students in ‘Thai higher education 4.0’. – Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies (FORMER NAME SILPAKORN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, HUMANITIES, AND ARTS) 12p.
Yang, F. (2016): Rethinking China’s Internet censorship: The practice of recoding and the politics of visibility. – New Media & Society 18(7): 1364-1381.
