ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT IN MALAYSIA: LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROACHES TO CONCILIATION, CONFRONTATION AND SUSTAINABILITY

Authors

  • NURUL SYAZWANI AIMI RAMLAN School of Social Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  • MOHAMAD SHAHARUDIN SAMSURIJAN School of Social Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
  • NURKHAIRUN SHUHADA RAZALI Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • MUHAMMAD HAFIZI ZAMRI Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si4.1660

Keywords:

Local Government Act 1976 (Act 171), environmental enforcement, systematic literature review, conciliation approach, confrontation approach, sustainable environmental governance

Abstract

Environmental enforcement by Malaysian local authorities plays a vital role in achieving sustainable environmental governance under the Local Government Act 1976 (Act 171). However, inconsistent enforcement practices, limited institutional capacity, inadequate financial resources, and personnel shortages continue to weaken regulatory effectiveness. This study systematically synthesises existing literature on environmental enforcement under Act 171 by examining confrontation and conciliation approaches alongside the Prevention Principle, Polluter Pays Principle, and Precautionary Principle. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies published between 1990 and 2024 were identified through Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed articles, legal documents, government reports, and selected grey literature were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed through qualitative thematic analysis. The findings indicate that although Act 171 provides a comprehensive legal framework, implementation is constrained by institutional weaknesses, inconsistent enforcement, and limited enforcement capacity. The review demonstrates that confrontation and conciliation strategies should be applied complementarily, while the Prevention, Polluter Pays, and Precautionary Principles collectively strengthen sustainable environmental governance. This review provides practical recommendations for improving environmental enforcement, institutional capacity, and policy implementation among Malaysian local authorities.

References

[1] Ariffin, M. (2019): Enforcement of environmental pollution control laws: A Malaysian case study. – International Journal of Public Law and Policy 6(2): 155-169.

[2] Brunnée, J. (2006): Enforcement mechanisms in international law and international environmental law. – In Beyerlin, U., Stoll, P.T., Wolfrum, R. (Eds.), Ensuring compliance with multilateral environmental agreements, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 24p.

[3] Earnhart, D., Glicksman, R.L. (2015): Extent of cooperative enforcement: Effect of the regulator-regulated facility relationship on audit frequency. – Strategic Behavior and the Environment 5(2): 111-156.

[4] Gibbs, D., Longhurst, J., Braithwaite, C. (1996): Moving towards sustainable development? Integrating economic development and the environment in local authorities. – Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39(3): 317-332.

[5] Halim, A.A., Hassan, S.H. (2016): Legislation for solid waste management. – In Control and treatment of landfill leachate for sanitary waste disposal, IGI Global 19p.

[6] Ahmad Halmi, N.A.Q., Abdul Rahman, H. (2021): Transformational of environmental governance in Malaysia towards environmental sustainability. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 11(19): 1-13.

[7] Humphreys, S. (1994): EPA enforcement at a crossroads. – Environmental Law 24(1): 1-30.

[8] Jahi, J.M. (1993): Local authorities and environmental management in Peninsular Malaysia. – Akademika 42/43: 205-222.

[9] Johar, F. (2003): Amalan kawalan perancangan pihak berkuasa tempatan di Semenanjung Malaysia: Tumpuan kepada aspek alam sekitar. – Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 250p.

[10] Levy, J., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L. (1996): Regulatory enforcement and negotiation in environmental management. – Canadian Water Resources Journal 21(3): 289-310.

[11] Mahmud, A.R. (2021): The need for improvement on environmental law in Malaysia. – International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 24(3): 66-70.

[12] Mishyna, N.V. (2025): Municipal environmental governance and human rights: Local authorities as key actors in sustainable development. – Naukovi Pratsi Natsionalnoho Universytetu Odeska Yurydychna Akademiia 36: 146-152.

[13] Patterson, A.M., Theobald, K. (1999): Emerging contradictions: Sustainable development and the new local governance. – In Buckingham-Hatfield, S., Percy, S. (Eds.), Constructing local environmental agendas, Routledge 13p.

[14] Pidgorodynska, Y.I. (2022): Approaches to enforcement of the international environmental treaties: Between detention and correction. – Constitutional State 47: 91-97.

[15] Potoski, M., Prakash, A. (2004): The regulation dilemma: Cooperation and conflict in environmental governance. – Public Administration Review 64(2): 152-163.

[16] Proelss, A. (2016): Principles of EU environmental law: An appraisal. – In Kansai University Institute of Comparative Law (Ed.), Principles of European environmental law, Springer 30p.

[17] Raff, Z., Earnhart, D. (2018): Effect of cooperative enforcement strategies on wastewater management. – Economic Inquiry 56(2): 1357-1379.

[18] Ramlogan, R. (2010): The polluter pays principle. – In Sustainable development: Towards a judicial interpretation, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 23p.

[19] Rasli, M.R., Abdul Manaf, H., Ismail, M. (2018): Lessons from Malaysian local government: Does resource management matter in enforcement actions? – The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Special Issue 6: 477-487.

[20] Razman, M.R., Azlan, A., Jahi, J.M., Arifin, K., Aiyub, K., Awang, Z., Lukman, Z.M. (2010): Urban sustainability and Malaysian laws on environmental management of chemical substances. – Research Journal of Applied Sciences 5(3): 172-176.

[21] de Sadeleer, N. (2020): Part I conclusions. – In Environmental principles: From political slogans to legal rules, Oxford University Press 2p.

[22] Sioutis, G. (2010): Twenty years of European environmental policy and law: An overview of certain aspects. – In Le droit public d'un siècle à l'autre / Public Law: Twenty Years After 10p.

[23] Tiwari, S. (2022): Polluter pays principle as a principle of sustainable development: A study in the Indian scenario. – South Asian Law Review Journal 8: 112-125.

[24] United Nations (1992): Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. – United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 6p.

[25] Vasudevan, A., Rusuli, M.S.C., Ab Rahman, A.A., Wan Mohd Nasir, W.M.N., Ibrahim, N., Ali, J.K., Huang, X. (2024): Cultivation of green environmental awareness towards cleanliness city in Malaysia. – Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 8(12): 8p.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT IN MALAYSIA: LOCAL GOVERNMENT APPROACHES TO CONCILIATION, CONFRONTATION AND SUSTAINABILITY. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(SI4), 635-643. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si4.1660