FUNDING-GOVERNANCE NEXUS AND COOPERATIVE SUSTAINABILITY IN MALAYSIA: EVIDENCE FROM SKM DATA (2020-2024)

Authors

  • AZLINA AHMAD Faculty of Business and Management, University Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • JAAFAR PYEMAN Faculty of Business and Management, University Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • WAN ANISABANUM SALLEH Faculty of Business and Management, University Teknologi MARA Terengganu Branch, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • MOHD KHAIRI ISMAIL Faculty of Business and Management, University Teknologi MARA Terengganu Branch, Terengganu, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si4.1550

Keywords:

cooperative sustainability, funding factors, governance quality, Malaysia, panel data

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between financing-related factors, specifically funding sources, funding allocation, and expenditure patterns, and cooperative sustainability in Malaysia's cooperative sector from 2020 to 2024, utilizing governance quality as a moderating institutional mechanism. The study specifically aims to: (i) investigate the correlation between funding source concentration and sustainability outcomes within cooperative size clusters; (ii) analyze disparities in funding allocation efficiency among cooperative functional categories; (iii) explore how expenditure patterns influence sustainability trajectories; and (iv) evaluate whether geographic performance variation aligns with governance quality as a moderating factor in the funding–sustainability relationship. The research utilizes secondary data from the 2024 Malaysian Cooperative Statistics issued by the Malaysian Cooperative Commission (SKM), encompassing 16,284 cooperatives from 2020 to 2024. The analysis use compound annual growth rates (CAGR) and ratio-based metrics to assess funding sources (equity and subscriptions), allocation efficiency (asset utilization), sustainability performance (revenue and membership expansion), and governance-related structural patterns. The results demonstrate that varied and internally sourced finance is positively correlated with sustainability, since large cooperatives dominate sectoral assets and exhibit more robust capital growth. Sustainability performance is more significantly affected by allocation efficiency than by asset size, and disciplined expenditure patterns enhance sustainability outcomes, with small cooperatives surpassing micro cooperatives. Substantial inter-state disparities in asset utilization further underscore the influence of governance quality as a moderating factor affecting financial efficacy. This study enhances the literature on cooperative sustainability by framing governance quality as a moderating institutional factor that influences the efficacy of financial resources, rather than as a direct determinant of performance. Policy implications underscore the necessity for size-specific measures, enhanced governance, and capacity-building initiatives to bolster cooperative sustainability in Malaysia.

References

[1] Barney, J.B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. – Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.

[2] Bernama (2022): Almost 40 pct of cooperatives not active or dormant-Noh. – Awani International 5p.

[3] Birchall, J. (2013): Resilience in a Downturn: The Power of Financial Cooperatives. – International Labour Office, Geneva 58p.

[4] Chaddad, F.R., Cook, M.L. (2004): Understanding new cooperative models: An ownership-control rights typology. – Review of Agricultural Economics 26(3): 348-360.

[5] Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. (1995): The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. – Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.

[6] Freeman, R.E. (1984): Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. – Pitman, Boston 276p.

[7] Grashuis, J. (2020): Returns to debt and equity in farm producer organizations. – Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 91(1): 55-69.

[8] Grashuis, J., Su, Y. (2019): A review of the empirical literature on farmer cooperatives: Performance, ownership and governance, finance, and member attitude. – Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 90(1): 77-102.

[9] Hamzah, S.M., Yusoff, M.N.H. (2025): The influence of financial management and financial literacy on co-operative performance in Malaysia. – Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs 7(24): 288-302.

[10] Ismail, M., Abd Aziz, N.A., Zainol, N.R., Yusoff, M.N.H., Abdul Rahim Merican, R.M. (2023): The determinants of cooperative sustainable development: A case study of Malaysian cooperatives. – In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A. (eds.), Sustainable Finance, Digitalization and the Role of Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer, Cham 487: 539-558.

[11] Jamaluddin, F., Saleh, N.M., Abdullah, A., Hassan, M.S., Hamzah, N., Jaffar, R., Abdul Ghani Aziz, S.A., Embong, Z. (2023): Cooperative governance and cooperative performance: A systematic literature review. – SAGE Open 13(3): 21p.

[12] Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976): Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. – Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.

[13] Kraus, A., Litzenberger, R.H. (1973): A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. – The Journal of Finance 28(4): 911-922.

[14] Levi, Y., Davis, P. (2008): Cooperatives as the ‘enfants terribles’ of economics: Some implications for the social economy. – The Journal of Socio-Economics 37(6): 2178-2188.

[15] Myers, S. C. (2001): Capital structure. – Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2): 81-102.

[16] Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S. (1984): Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. – Journal of Financial Economics 13(2): 187-221.

[17] Nilsson, J., Svendsen, G.L.H., Svendsen, G.T. (2012): Are large and complex agricultural cooperatives losing their social capital? – Agribusiness 28(2): 187-204.

[18] Othman, I.W., Mohamad, M., Abdullah, A. (2013): Cooperative movements in Malaysia: The issue of governance. – World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 7(6): 1488-1492.

[19] Othman, R., Embi, R., Abdul Aris, N., Mohd Arif, S.M., Choo, H.C., Ismail, N. (2016): Board governance and performance: An exploratory study of Malaysian cooperative organizations. – Journal of Southeast Asian Research 2016 12p.

[20] Penrose, E.T. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. – Wiley, New York 272p.

[21] Rahim, S.A.A., Mohamed, I.S. (2025): Internal control effectiveness in Malaysian cooperatives: Insights from self-organizing maps and artificial neural networks. – Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change 10(4): 1531-1543.

[22] Suruhanjaya Koperasi Malaysia (2024): Laporan Perangkaan 2024. – Suruhanjaya Koperasi Malaysia Official Portal, Kuala Lumpur 100p.

[23] Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm. – Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.

[24] Yuhertiana, I., Zakaria, M., Suhartini, D., Sukiswo, H.W. (2022): Cooperative resilience during the pandemic: Indonesia and Malaysia evidence. – Sustainability 14(10): 13p.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FUNDING-GOVERNANCE NEXUS AND COOPERATIVE SUSTAINABILITY IN MALAYSIA: EVIDENCE FROM SKM DATA (2020-2024). (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(SI4), 122-130. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si4.1550