ADVANCING GREEN PORT INITIATIVES: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE FUEL BUNKERING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7si4.1549Keywords:
green port initiatives, bunkering, decarbonization, clean energy, international maritime organizationAbstract
The maritime shipping industry plays a vital role in global trade but continues to face environmental challenges due to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels, particularly in fuel bunkering operations. This study proposes a conceptual framework to support sustainable fuel bunkering within Green Port Initiatives (GPIs) in Malaysian ports. Using a qualitative conceptual approach based on literature and policy reviews, the framework integrates five key dimensions: technological innovation, policy and regulatory mechanisms, infrastructure development, stakeholder engagement, and inter-port bunkering substations development. The framework is guided by best practices from leading ports such as Singapore and Rotterdam and emphasizes the importance of regulatory support, infrastructure readiness, and stakeholder collaboration in achieving maritime decarbonization. It also aligns with international environmental frameworks, including the IMO GHG Strategy 2023. The study highlights that sustainable fuel bunkering is not only important for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts but also for improving the competitiveness, resilience, and long-term sustainability of Malaysian ports. The proposed framework provides practical guidance for policymakers, port authorities, and maritime stakeholders in supporting green port development and sustainable maritime logistics.
References
[1] Aaserud, J. (2024): How do the total methane and CO2 emissions from using LNG as a marine fuel compare to the emissions from using other marine fuels such as heavy fuel oil (HFO), marine diesel oil (MDO), and marine gas oil (MGO)? – University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway 100p.
[2] Alamoush, A.S., Ölçer, A.I., Ballini, F. (2022): Port greenhouse gas emission reduction: Port and public authorities’ implementation schemes. – Research in Transportation Business and Management 43: 18p.
[3] Alamoush, A.S., Ballini, F., Ölcer, A.I. (2024): Management of stakeholders engaged in port energy transition. – Energy Policy 188: 18p.
[4] Alenazi, A.A. (2021): Challenges and opportunities for the integration, production, transportation, and utilisation of clean fuels for maritime applications. – Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar 120p.
[5] Bahri, M.S.S., Shariff, S.S.R., Yahya, N. (2025): Sustainable port operations and environmental initiatives in Malaysia: A focus on environmental sustainability. – The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 41(1): 38-51.
[6] Bakar, N.N.A., Bazmohammadi, N., Vasquez, J.C., Guerrero, J.M. (2023): Electrification of onshore power systems in maritime transportation towards decarbonization of ports: A review of the cold ironing technology. – Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 178: 25p.
[7] Baumler, R., Arce, M.C., Pazaver, A. (2021): Quantification of influence and interest at IMO in maritime safety and human element matters. – Marine Policy 133: 14p.
[8] Densberger, N.L., Bachkar, K. (2022): Towards accelerating the adoption of zero emissions cargo handling technologies in California ports: Lessons learned from the case of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. – Journal of Cleaner Production 347: 11p.
[9] Duong, P.A., Ryu, B.R., Song, M.K., Nguyen, H.V., Nam, D., Kang, H. (2023): Safety assessment of the ammonia bunkering process in the maritime sector: A review. – Energies 16(10): 30p.
[10] Florez, C., Betancur, V. (2021): Benchmark for reduction of anchored vessels emissions: Enabling change of operations-Research on air pollution management in the Port of Gothenburg, Sweden. – Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden 101p.
[11] Grosso, M., Lodi, C., Zawieska, J., Piazza, F., Stepniak, M., Cheimariotis, I., Rataj, M., Marotta, A. (2025): Research and innovation supporting the decarbonisation of the European waterborne sector. – Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg 118p.
[12] Hendriks, C., de Gooyert, V. (2023): Towards sustainable port areas: Dynamics of industrial decarbonization and the role of port authorities. – Research Report 37p.
[13] Hoang, A.T., Foley, A.M., Nižetić, S., Huang, Z., Ong, H.C., Ölçer, A.I., Pham, V.V., Nguyen, X.P. (2022): Energy-related approach for reduction of CO2 emissions: A critical strategy on the port-to-ship pathway. – Journal of Cleaner Production 355: 22p.
[14] Idris, H. (2022): Southeast Asian port development: Policy and initiatives towards achieving 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development Goals. – Akademika 92(2): 129-142.
[15] Ismail, A.M.I.M. (2023): Green shipping corridors: A comprehensive framework for overcoming port challenges. – Master’s dissertation, World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden 98p.
[16] Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N.H., Abdul Karim, N.H., Cullinane, K. (2023): An environmental management system in seaports: Evidence from Malaysia. – Maritime Policy and Management 50(8): 1118-1135.
[17] Jensen, A.E. (2020): Baltic-Adriatic: Fourth work plan of the European Coordinator. – European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels 32p.
[18] Jin, Y., Feng, Y. (2024): Asia-Pacific maritime security cooperation: Challenges and opportunities. – Marine Policy 160: 12p.
[19] Joung, T.H., Kang, S.G., Lee, J.K., Ahn, J. (2020): The IMO initial strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050. – Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping 4(1): 1-7.
[20] Kamal, B., Kutay, Ş. (2021): Assessment of causal mechanism of ship bunkering oil pollution. – Ocean and Coastal Management 215: 15p.
[21] Karimpour, R. (2022): Onshore power supply in northwest Italian ports to reduce ships emissions: A focus on quantifying the social-economic benefits. – University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy 150p.
[22] Khalili, L. (2021): Sinews of war and trade: Shipping and capitalism in the Arabian Peninsula. – Verso Books, London 384p.
[23] Klopott, M., Popek, M., Urbanyi-Popiołek, I. (2023): Seaports’ role in ensuring the availability of alternative marine fuels-A multi-faceted analysis. – Energies 16(7): 30p.
[24] Knaving, S., Nilsen, L. (2022): Navigating the waves of change: Sweden’s journey towards electrification in maritime shipping. – Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden 60p.
[25] Kornowski, P.C. (2023): Towards sustainable shipping: The adoption of UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the maritime container shipping industry. – Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal 90p.
[26] Lebedevas, S., Malūkas, A. (2024): The application of cryogenic carbon capture technology on the dual-fuel ship through the utilisation of LNG cold potential. – Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12(2): 18p.
[27] Lee, D., Kim, K. (2021): Research and development investment and collaboration framework for the hydrogen economy in South Korea. – Sustainability 13(19): 19p.
[28] Lee, H., Park, D., Choo, S., Pham, H.T. (2020): Estimation of the non-greenhouse gas emissions inventory from ships in the Port of Incheon. – Sustainability 12(19): 18p.
[29] Lee, H.L., Lee, V.S., Md Akil, M.A.M., Mohammed Akib, N.A., Gew, L.T., Lim, T.H., Othman, R., Su’ait, M.S., Tang, W.H., Yeoh, Y.K., Chee, S.Y. (2025): Malaysia’s progress in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the lens of chemistry. – Pure and Applied Chemistry 97(1): 91-119.
[30] Mahmud, K.K., Chowdhury, M.M.H., Shaheen, M.M.A. (2024): Green port management practices for sustainable port operations: A multi-method study of Asian ports. – Maritime Policy and Management 51(8): 1902-1937.
[31] Mohd Zaideen, I.M., Ramli, M.F. (2026): The repercussions of enacting the IMO 2020 regulation for mitigating ship emissions in Malaysian waters. – Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 18(1): 192-204.
[32] Mustaffa, N.K., Shahrudin, N.S.N., Mustaffa, A. (2023): The pathway toward sustainable and resilient infrastructure development in Malaysia. – Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure 8(6): 648-674.
[33] Notteboom, T., Haralambides, H. (2023): Seaports as green hydrogen hubs: Advances, opportunities and challenges in Europe. – Maritime Economics and Logistics 25(1): 1-27.
[34] Ramsay, W., Fridell, E., Michan, M. (2023): Maritime energy transition: Future fuels and future emissions. – Journal of Marine Science and Application 22(4): 681-692.
[35] Rebelo, P. (2021): Green shipping: A legal evaluation of the contractual mechanisms by private industry actors to achieve a sectoral transition. – University of London, London 260p.
[36] Roh, S., Thai, V.V., Jang, H., Yeo, G.T. (2023): The best practices of port sustainable development: A case study in Korea. – Maritime Policy and Management 50(2): 254-280.
[37] Sadiq, M., Ali, S.W., Terriche, Y., Mutarraf, M.U., Hassan, M.A., Hamid, K., Ali, Z., Sze, J.Y., Su, C.L., Guerrero, J.M. (2021): Future greener seaports: A review of new infrastructure, challenges, and energy efficiency measures. – IEEE Access 9: 75568-75587.
[38] Salminen, T. (2024): Alternative maritime fuels in Nordic shipping: A comprehensive analysis of the emerging ecosystem. – Aalto University, Finland 147p.
[39] Saxena, S. (2024): Navigating energy transition: A marine logistics perspective. – Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (ADIPEC), Abu Dhabi 16p.
[40] Sogut, M.Z., Erdoğan, O. (2022): An investigation on a holistic framework of green port transition based on energy and environmental sustainability. – Ocean Engineering 266: 15p.
[41] Tang, H. (2024): Research on the development and policies of the Port of Singapore Harbor. – Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences 80: 275-282.
[42] United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN ESCAP) (2023): Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, No. 93: Low carbon transport. – United Nations ESCAP, Bangkok 80p.
[43] Vedachalam, S., Baquerizo, N., Dalai, A.K. (2022): Review on impacts of low sulfur regulations on marine fuels and compliance options. – Fuel 310: 20p.
[44] Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. (2022): Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains. – Nature Communications 13: 13p.
[45] Wang, J., Li, H., Yang, Z., Ge, Y.E. (2024): Shore power for reduction of shipping emission in port: A bibliometric analysis. – Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 188: 16p.
[46] Yahya, N.K. (2024): Geographical, economic, and socio-political determinants in the development of natural ports: A comprehensive analysis. – International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management 11(1): 124-146.
[47] Yap, W.Y., Notteboom, T. (2024): Renewable energy options for seaport cargo terminals with application to mega port Singapore. – Maritime Business Review 9(4): 294-310.
[48] Zain, R.M., Jeevan, J., Mohd Salleh, N.H., Ngah, A.H., Ramli, A., Mohd Zain, M.Z., Yekini, L.S., Dirie, A.N. (2024): Future opportunities for port city development: A reciprocal evaluation for competitive advantage for Malaysian seaports. – Journal of Maritime Research 21(1): 265-282.
[49] Zhang, W., Li, C., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Shu, Y., Song, L., Xu, L., Di, Z. (2021): Governance of global vessel-source marine oil spills: Characteristics and refreshed strategies. – Ocean and Coastal Management 213: 12p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 IZNOORHAKMAL IBRAHIM, SITI AYU JALIL, ABDUL RAUF ABDUL RASAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
