PENDEKATAN TEORI STRUKTURALISME DALAM KAJIAN ANTROPOLOGI BUDAYA: KAJIAN KES DI SABAH

A STRUCTURALIST THEORETICAL APPROACH TO CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: A CASE STUDY OF SABAH

Authors

  • ZULAYTI ZAKARIA Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • MOHAMAD IKHRAM MOHAMAD RIDZUAN Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • CYRIL MODILI Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.
  • HAIRULNIZAM MOHD KHOIRI Fakulti Sains Sosial Gunaan, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • MIVOLIL DUINONG Pusat Persediaan Sains dan Teknologi, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1370

Keywords:

teori strukturalisme, antropologi budaya, identiti budaya, struktur sosial, Sabah

Abstract

Teori strukturalisme merupakan salah satu pendekatan penting dalam bidang sosiologi dan antropologi budaya yang berkembang pesat sekitar pertengahan abad ke-20. Pendekatan ini memberi penekanan terhadap kewujudan struktur sosial dan budaya yang mendasari tingkah laku manusia serta membentuk cara individu memahami dunia sekeliling mereka. Dalam konteks kajian budaya, strukturalisme melihat masyarakat sebagai satu sistem yang terdiri daripada pelbagai unsur yang saling berkaitan dan berfungsi secara kolektif untuk menghasilkan makna sosial. Artikel ini membincangkan secara mendalam latar belakang kemunculan teori strukturalisme, tokoh-tokoh utama yang mempeloporinya, premis asas teori, konsep-konsep utama, serta aplikasi dan sumbangannya dalam kajian budaya khususnya di Sabah. Perbincangan turut meneliti kekuatan dan keterbatasan teori ini dalam memahami perubahan sosial dan dinamika budaya masyarakat kontemporari. Dalam konteks Sabah yang mempunyai kepelbagaian etnik seperti Kadazan-Dusun, Bajau, Murut, Rungus dan lain-lain, teori strukturalisme menjadi satu pendekatan yang signifikan untuk memahami hubungan antara ritual, simbol, bahasa, mitos dan adat resam yang membentuk identiti budaya masyarakat. Melalui analisis terhadap amalan budaya seperti Pesta Kaamatan, ritual tradisional, sistem kekeluargaan dan simbol kepercayaan masyarakat tempatan, teori ini membantu menjelaskan bagaimana struktur budaya mempengaruhi pemikiran dan tindakan sosial individu. Selain itu, artikel ini turut membincangkan bagaimana globalisasi, urbanisasi dan perkembangan teknologi media telah membawa perubahan terhadap struktur budaya tradisional masyarakat Sabah. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan analitikal dan kritikal, artikel ini menunjukkan bahawa teori strukturalisme masih relevan sebagai kerangka memahami perubahan budaya dan identiti sosial dalam masyarakat moden di Malaysia.

Structuralism is one of the most influential theoretical approaches in sociology and cultural anthropology, gaining prominence during the mid-twentieth century. The theory emphasises the existence of underlying social and cultural structures that shape human behaviour, social relations, and the ways individuals interpret their surrounding environment. Within cultural studies, structuralism views society as a system of interconnected elements that work collectively to produce and sustain social meaning.This article examines the historical development of structuralist theory, its principal scholars, fundamental assumptions, key concepts, and its contributions to cultural anthropology. Particular attention is given to its application in understanding the cultural diversity of Sabah. As a state characterised by rich ethnic and cultural plurality, including communities such as the Kadazan-Dusun, Bajau, Murut, and Rungus, Sabah provides a valuable context for exploring how rituals, symbols, language, myths, and customary practices contribute to the formation and maintenance of cultural identity. Drawing on examples such as the Kaamatan Festival, traditional rituals, kinship systems, and local belief systems, the article demonstrates how structuralist analysis can reveal the underlying cultural patterns that influence social behaviour and collective understanding. The discussion further explores the impact of globalisation, urbanisation, and technological advancement on traditional cultural structures, highlighting the ways in which contemporary social changes have transformed cultural practices and identities within Sabah society. In addition, the article critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of structuralism as an analytical framework, particularly in explaining social change and cultural transformation in modern societies. Through a comprehensive and critical examination, this study argues that structuralism remains a relevant theoretical perspective for understanding the relationship between culture, identity, and social organisation in contemporary Malaysia.

References

[1] Barlocco, F. (2011): A tale of two celebrations: The Pesta Kaamatan as a site of struggle between a minority and the state in Sabah, East Malaysia. – Asian Journal of Social Science 39(5): 605-626.

[2] Durkheim, E. (1984): The division of labor in society. – Free Press, New York 352p.

[3] Gwerevende, S., Mthombeni, Z.M. (2023): Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: Exploring the synergies in the transmission of Indigenous languages, dance and music practices in Southern Africa. – International Journal of Heritage Studies 29(5): 398-412.

[4] Hussin, H. (2005): Ritual padi komuniti Kadazan Dataran Penampang, Sabah. – JATI-Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 10: 171-203.

[5] Hussin, R. (2006): Ecotourism and community development: Case studies of Batu Puteh and Sukau villages in Kinabatangan, Sabah, Malaysia. – Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow 330p.

[6] Iskandar, R.S.F., Karjanto, N., Kusumah, Y.S., Ihsan, I.R. (2022): A systematic literature review on ethnomathematics in geometry. – Journal on Mathematics Education 13(1): 1-18.

[7] Ku Chun Moi, A. (2019): Cultural convergence in the music and oral traditions of the Kadazan Dusun of Membakut, Sabah. – Universiti Malaysia Sabah 300p.

[8] Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963): Structural anthropology. – Basic Books, New York 410p.

[9] Low, K.O., Sim, C.C. (2020): Birth, initiation and death elements in the folk narrative of the Tambunan Dusun of Sabah, Malaysia. – Malay Literature 33(2): 169-192.

[10] McHattie, L.S., Teo, B.T.W. (2024): Indigenous relations: Craft, vernacular materials and cultural assets in Borneo. – CoDesign 20(1): 194-217.

[11] Pugh-Kitingan, J. (2012): Kadazandusun. – Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 200p.

[12] Ridzuan, M.I., Dollah, R., Ikfal Raharjo, S.N. (2024a): Perpindahan Ibu Kota Jakarta ke Kalimantan: Peranan masyarakat Pantai Timur Sabah dalam meminimumkan impak keselamatan nasional. – Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategy 51(4): 527-547.

[13] Ridzuan, M.I.M., Jambol, D.J.A., Zulkifli, N., Abdullah, Z. (2024b): Interdependency and reliability in Malaysia-China relations amidst the balance of threat. – Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 5(5): 1-10.

[14] Ridzuan, M.I.M., Maraining, A. (2025): Keselamatan makanan: Pemetaan penanaman semula kelapa sawit di Lahad Datu, Sabah. – MANU 36(1): 27-46.

[15] Saussure, F.D. (1983): Course in general linguistics. – Open Court, LaSalle 236p.

[16] Siti Aidah, L.L., Sintang, S., Johnes, J. (2022): Sejarah dan pengalaman hubungan etnik di Sabah: Kesepaduan dalam kepelbagaian. – e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 19(6): 1-25.

[17] Tangit, T.M. (2024): Conceptualizing the language and cultural ideologies of the Kadazandusun in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. – Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 6(1): 60-75.

[18] Widodo, S.T., Suyatno, S., Mohamad, B., Ismail, S. (2025): Exploring the changing of name as a socio-cultural adaptation strategy of the Javanese Diaspora in Sabah Borneo-Malaysia. – Frontiers in Sociology 10: 12p.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PENDEKATAN TEORI STRUKTURALISME DALAM KAJIAN ANTROPOLOGI BUDAYA: KAJIAN KES DI SABAH: A STRUCTURALIST THEORETICAL APPROACH TO CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY: A CASE STUDY OF SABAH. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(5), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i5.1370