BEYOND ATTENTION AND EMOTION: RECONSIDERING NEUROMARKETING EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH COGNITIVE LOAD AND NEURODIVERGENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i4.1258Keywords:
neuromarketing, neurodivergence, cognitive load, emotional engagement, purchase intentionAbstract
Most neuromarketing research assumes that stronger stimuli produce better consumer outcomes, but that assumption deserves closer scrutiny. This study examines whether neuromarketing stimuli operate uniformly across consumers or whether their effectiveness depends on how those stimuli are cognitively processed. Drawing on the stimulus organism response framework and cognitive load theory, we develop conditional model connecting neuromarketing stimuli to attention, emotional engagement, cognitive load, and purchase intention. A quantitative approach was used, collecting survey data from 412 digital consumers in Malaysia and analysing the data through structural equation modelling. The results confirm that neuromarketing stimuli increase both attention and emotional engagement, each of which raises purchase intention. At the same time, the same stimuli generate cognitive load, which substantially reduces purchase intention. Neurodivergence intensifies this negative relationship, meaning that consumers with atypical cognitive profiles face a disproportionate burden in cognitively demanding marketing environments. These findings directly reframe the standard logic of neuromarketing design. Effectiveness is not a function of stimulus intensity alone; it depends on how well the marketing environment accommodates different cognitive capacities. Practitioners and researchers alike should treat cognitive inclusivity as a design criterion, not merely an afterthought.
References
[1] Ali, A., Putit, L., Mohamad Arshad, A.S., Kamall Khan, Y., Hendryati, H. (2024): Neuromarketing readiness in Malaysia: Where are we now? – Journal of International Business, Economics and Entrepreneurship 9(1): 52-58.
[2] Alsharif, A.H., Salleh, N.Z.M., Baharun, R., Hashem E, A.R. (2021): Neuromarketing research in the last five years: A bibliometric analysis. – Cogent Business and Management 8(1): 26p.
[3] Amer, A., Ibrahim, I. (2025): Artificial intelligence in marketing for halal supply chain management: Leveraging technology for strategic growth in Malaysia. – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 9(1): 3115-3124.
[4] Amer, A., Ibrahim, I., Selamat, H.S., Apandi, A.A.A., Sundram, V.P.K. (2025): Neuromarketing and the role of emotions in customer retention for startups: A qualitative study in Malaysia. – International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 9(5): 842-856.
[5] Chapman, R. (2021): Neurodiversity and the social ecology of mental functions. – Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(6): 1360-1372.
[6] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D. (2023): Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. – SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 320p.
[7] Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B., Grewal, D. (1991): Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. – Journal of Marketing Research 28(3): 307-319.
[8] Doyle, N. (2020): Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. – British Medical Bulletin 135(1): 108-125.
[9] Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. (2019): Multivariate data analysis. – Cengage Learning, Andover 832p.
[10] Kline, R.B. (2023): Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. – Guilford Press, New York 494p.
[11] Othman, H., Ibrahim, I., Apandi, A.A.A., Anah, L., Amer, A. (2026): Integrating artificial intelligence and neuromarketing for sustainable logistics innovation in Malaysia: A multi-case study approach. – International Journal of Innovation and Industrial Revolution 8(24): 48-67.
[12] Pieters, R., Wedel, M. (2004): Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. – Journal of Marketing 68(2): 36-50.
[13] Plassmann, H., Ramsøy, T.Z., Milosavljevic, M. (2012): Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. – Journal of Consumer Psychology 22(1): 18-36.
[14] Sekaran, U., Bougie, R. (2020): Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. – Wiley, Hoboken 432p.
[15] Smidts, A., Hsu, M., Sanfey, A.G., Boksem, M.A.S., Ebstein, R.B., Huettel, S.A., Kable, J.W., Karmarkar, U.R., Kitayama, S., Knutson, B., Liberzon, I., Lohrenz, T., Stallen, M., Yoon, C. (2014): Advancing consumer neuroscience. – Marketing Letters 25(3): 257-267.
[16] Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S. (2011): Cognitive load theory. – Springer, New York 290p.
[17] Vieira, V.A. (2013): Stimuli-organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. – Journal of Business Research 66(9): 1420-1426.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 AFIZAN AMER, IRWAN IBRAHIM, ALBERT FEISAL @ MUHD FEISAL ISMAIL, SITI NURHIJAN MAHAMAD HASRI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
