POLITENESS AND SILENCE IN JAPANESE INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i2.1181Keywords:
autoethnography, intercultural communication, politeness, Japan, technology-mediated communicationAbstract
Intercultural communication is frequently examined within formal educational, institutional, or workplace contexts, while everyday intercultural encounters during travel remain comparatively underexplored. This paper presents an autoethnographic reflection on intercultural communication experiences during a short visit to Japan, focusing on how cultural norms and communicative practices shape social interaction in public and service-oriented spaces. Drawing on personal observations, reflective journaling, and interpretive analysis, the study examines how silence, politeness, indirectness, and non-verbal communication mediate meaning-making between individuals from different cultural backgrounds. Guided by intercultural communication frameworks and politeness theory, the paper explores how culturally embedded practices such as bowing, queuing etiquette, minimal verbal exchanges, and technology-assisted communication influence interactional expectations and perceptions. The analysis demonstrates that effective intercultural communication extends beyond linguistic proficiency and requires sensitivity toward implicit social cues, contextual appropriateness, and culturally preferred interactional styles. The findings further highlight the role of adaptive communicative strategies and reflective awareness in reducing misunderstanding and promoting respectful engagement across cultures. In addition, the study underscores the pedagogical value of travel-based autoethnography in fostering intercultural competence, critical self-reflection, and context-aware communication practices in English as a lingua franca settings within increasingly globalised and technology-mediated societies.
References
[1] Aljarelah, A.K. (2024): Language and international communication: The impact of language on international understanding and diplomatic relations. – The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 6(6): 144-175.
[2] Brown, P., Levinson, S.C. (1987): Politeness: Some universals in language usage. – Cambridge University Press 345p.
[3] Chand, S.P. (2025): Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. – Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation 6(1): 303-317.
[4] Cooper, R., Lilyea, B. (2022): I’m interested in autoethnography, but how do I do it. – The Qualitative Report 27(1): 197-208.
[5] Gan, I. (2025): How do frequent newcomers’ ingroup/outgroup identities shape organizational socialization and work communication? – Communication Studies 21p.
[6] Halls, H.C. (1976): A least-squares method to find a remanence direction from converging remagnetization circles. – Geophysical Journal International 45(2): 297-304.
[7] Hall, J.B., Swaine, M. (1976): Classification and ecology of closed-canopy forest in Ghana. – The Journal of Ecology 38p.
[8] Harumi, S. (2024): Multi-contextual perspectives on silence: a narrative case study. – Neofilolog 27p.
[9] Harumi, S., Bao, D. (2025): Silence as reflective agency: A multilingual JFL learner’s longitudinal trajectory. – Journal of Silence Studies in Education 5(1): 63-83.
[10] Nakano, S., Tanaka, T., Mikushi, K. (2022): Cross-cultural social skills instruction and indirect expressions: Psychoeducation in Japan’s high-context culture. – IAFOR Journal of Psychology & the Behavioral Sciences 8(2): 19-35.
[11] Rai, B.S. (2025): Linguistic Politeness and Social Hierarchies: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Etiquette in Communication. – PEARL Multidisciplinary Journal 10(2): 81-94.
[12] Sato, R. (2024): Exploring the silence of Japanese EFL learners: Its relationship with the degree of willingness to communicate (WTC). – Language Teaching Research 21p.
[13] Shahwan, S.J. (2025): The Pragmatics of Silence in Human Interaction. – International Journal of Communication & Linguistic Studies 23(3): 1-19.
[14] Shen, Z., Zhao, M., Lai, M. (2023): Analysis of politeness based on naturally occurring and authentic conversations. – Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 19(3): 27-35.
[15] Soomro, M.A., Aqdas, S. (2023): Research in Im/Politeness Across Cultures and Contexts. – International" Journal of Academic Research for Humanities" 3(3): 122-129.
[16] Szabo, R.A. (2025): The Invisible Bridge: How Foreign Tourism Professionals Foster Bridging Social Capital in Japan. – Journal of Intercultural Communication 25(2): 101-115.
[17] Ye, Z. (2024): Language barriers in intercultural communication and their translation strategies. – In International Conference on Finance and Economics, Humanistic Sociology and Educational Development (EHSED 2024) 6(1): 9-17.
[18] Yu, J., Meng, T. (2026): Image generative AI in tourism: Trends, impacts, and future research directions. – Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 50(2): 288-301.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 HAIDA UMIERA HASHIM, KATSUYA YOKOMOTO

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.