THE READING STRATEGIST: AN ONLINE READING GAME FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Authors

  • JACINTA ANN XAVIER BELAMAN Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • AFIQAH ABD AZIZ Centre of Foundation Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Dengkil Branch, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • FATIHAH HASHIM Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • SITI FAUZIANA ZAKARIA Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i2.1170

Keywords:

acceptance, gamification, reading comprehension, usability, user experience

Abstract

Gamification is an educational approach that has been gradually introduced into the learning environment in recent years to enhance students' interest and enthusiasm for reading. Digital reading games provide interactive environments where learners may apply reading strategies in a more engaging way. The ongoing study aims to evaluate the usability and acceptance of The Reading Strategist, a Web-based game designed to support students in practicing reading comprehension. A quantitative survey design was used, involving 25 undergraduate students at a Malaysian government university; the participants were exposed to the game beforehand before completing the questionnaire. The survey tool was designed into four different segments assessing perceived usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment and behavioural intention. Findings showed high usability scores and a positive attitude toward the game, with perceived usefulness and enjoyment receiving the highest mean scores. Respondents also wanted to continue using and referring to the game. These findings imply that gamified reading tools like The Reading Strategist have significant potential to facilitate student engagement and reading practice in the language learning context.

References

[1] Ajzen, I. (1991): The theory of planned behavior. – Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211.

[2] Anderson, C.A., Dill, K.E. (2000): Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(4): 772-790.

[3] Belaman, J.A.X., Hashim, F.B., Zakaria, S.F., Abd Aziz, A. (2023): Online Reading and Reasons for Reading Struggles: A Case Study. – International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 13(20): 1845-1867.

[4] Brooke, J. (1996): SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. – Usability Evaluation in Industry 189(194): 4-7.

[5] Davis, F.D. (1989): Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. – MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319-340.

[6] Dawson, E.R., Greene, L.M., Al-Mutairi, H., Iglesias, R. (2025): Gamification in Remote Learning: Enhancing Student Engagement in Virtual Classrooms. – OTS Canadian Journal 4(7): 1-13.

[7] Gee, J.P. (2003): What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. – Computers In Entertainment (CIE) 1(1): 4p.

[8] Mangen, A., Walgermo, B.R., Brønnick, K. (2013): Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. – International Journal of Educational Research 58: 61-68.

[9] Nguyen-Viet, B., Doan Ngoc Minh, H. (2025): How gamification enhances learning effectiveness through blended learning and intrinsic motivation: the moderating effects of self-regulation. – Sage Open 15(4): 15p.

[10] Nielsen, J. (1994): Usability engineering. – Morgan Kaufmann 351p.

[11] Shneiderman, B. (2010): Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. – Pearson Education India 672p.

[12] Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D. (2000): A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. – Management Science 46(2): 186-204.

[13] Zhang, S., Hasim, Z. (2023): Gamification in EFL/ESL instruction: A systematic review of empirical research. – Frontiers in Psychology 13: 12p.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE READING STRATEGIST: AN ONLINE READING GAME FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. (2026). Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), 648-661. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v7i2.1170