A REVIEW ON DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES FOR AN INLAND PORT AT MALAYSIA-THAILAND BORDER
Keywords:challenges, development, inland ports, Bukit Kayu Hitam (BKH), Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
An inland port helps enhance the global supply chain or process it by attaching value to raw goods, serving a higher quality of operation, and serving as a procurement path for the commodities required to reduce overall shipping costs. Inland ports can eliminate or reduce the uncertainty related to customs and border delays and become JIT, enabling fast and efficient production. However, the inland port development has several problems that will be affected their operations in the future. The objective of this study was to review the challenges to the development of an inland port at Malaysia Thailand border (Bukit Kayu Hitam (BKH)). A few challenges BKH will be facing in developing inland ports are lacking of transport infrastructure and operational activities, information sharing between crucial stakeholders (players), competition between other ports, and high cost labor and non-automatic cargo inspection. A systematic Literature Review (SLR) combine with bibliometric analysis approach being adopted to review the challenges facing other ports and inland ports worldwide. Total 100 articles related to the topic from 2004 and 2021 were selected and reviewed. Bibliometric analysis was used to determine the quantity of literature, the number of writers, and the number of related themes. Literatures were reviewed and evaluated using VOSviewer software by creating, visualizing, and analyzing the inputs. The findings had supported the challenges that affected the development of an inland port at BKH. Recommendations to develop the inland port at BKH were discussed for the stakeholders and other parties.
Anor, N., Ahmad, Z., Abdullah, J., Hafizah, R.N. (2012): Road Network System in Port Klang, Malaysia and Impacts to Travel Patterns. – Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 35: 629-636.
Anor, N., Ahmad, Z. (2010): The effectiveness of a road transportation network system in a port city: towards green logistics in Malaysia. – In proceeding of Malaysian Universities Transportation Research Forum and Conferences 2010 (MUTRFC 2010) 12p.
Black, J., Kyu, T., Roso, V., Tara, K. (2013): Critical evaluation of Mandalay dry port, Myanmar. – In Proceedings 5th International Conference on Logistics and Transport 4p.
Cikarang Dry Port (CDP) (2016): Cikarang Dry Port-Indonesia. – CDP 29p.
Cullinane, K., Bergqvist, R., Wilmsmeier, G. (2012): The dry port concept - Theory and practice. – Maritime Economics and Logistics 14(1): 1-13.
Do, N.H., Nam, K.C., Le, Q.L.N. (2011): A consideration for developing a dry port system in Indochina area. – Maritime Policy and Management 38(1): 1-9.
FDT (2007): Feasibility Study on the Network Operation of Hinterland Hubs (Dry Port Concept) to Improve and Modernise Ports’ Connections to the Hinterland and to Improve Networking. – Integrating Logistics Centre Network: Baltic Sea Region 74p.
Fechner, I. (2012): Dry Port Development Case Study: Dry Port Poznan Poland. – Institute of Logistics and Warehousing 22p.
Galvão, C.B., Robles, L.T., Guerise, L.C. (2013): The Brazilian seaport system: A post-1990 institutional and economic review. – Research in Transportation Business and Management 8: 17-29.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., De Lacey, S. (2016): Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. – Human Reproduction 31(3): 498-501.
Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., Voß, S. (2017): Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework. – NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 18(2–3): 227-254.
Jager, B., Lin, N. (2016): The changing nature of cargo container handling needs information sharing as a key performance indicator. – In 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS) 9p.
Jeevan, J., Chen, S.L., Cahoon, S. (2016): Malaysian Container Seaport-Hinterland Connectivity: Status, Challenges and Strategies. – Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 32(3): 127-138.
Jeevan, J., Chen, S.L., Cahoon, S. (2015): Influential factors of Malaysian dry port operations. – In International Association of Maritime Economists Conference: The Role of Maritime Clusters and Innovation in Shaping Future Global Trade 22p.
Lord, M.J., Tangtrongjita, P. (2016): Special Border Economic Zone (SBEZ) in the Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT). – Munich Personal RePEc Archive 116p.
Monios, J., Notteboom, T., Wilmsmeier, G., Rodrigue, J.P. (2016): Competition and complementarity between seaports and hinterlands for locating distribution activities. – Port Economics Discussion Report 31p.
Monios, J., Wilmsmeier, G. (2014): The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies. – Transport Reviews 34(5): 583-606.
Monios, J. (2011): The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. – Research in Transportation Economics, 33(1), 59-66.
Mwendapole, M.J., Jin, Z. (2020): Status, Challenges and Strategies of Dar es Salaam Seaport-Hinterland Connectivity. – In MATEC Web of Conferences 325: 9p.
Najimudin, M.F., Md Dahlan, N.H., Md. Nor, M.Z. (2020): Establishment of Bukit Kayu Hitam as a Special Border Economic Zone (SBEZ): Global lessons. – Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal 5(14): 221-226.
Ng, A.K.Y., Padilha, F., Pallis, A.A. (2013): Institutions, bureaucratic and logistical roles of dry ports: The Brazilian experiences. – Journal of Transport Geography 27: 46-55.
Othman, M.R., Jeevan, J., Rizal, S. (2016): The Malaysian Intermodal Terminal System: The Implication on the Malaysian Maritime Cluster. – International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy 4: 46-61.
Polyzos, S., Tsiotas, D. (2020): The contribution of transport infrastructures to the economic and regional development. – Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management 15(1): 5-23.
Qin, L.Z. (2010): The development the dry ports in China and countermeasure. – Journal of Port Economy 9(22): 21-23.
Roso, V., Woxenius, J., Lumsden, K. (2009): The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. – Journal of Transport Geography 17(5): 338-345.
Scaramelli, S. (2010). The Determinants of Port Competitiveness: The Case of Valencia. – Erasmus University Rotterdam 108p.
Sitorus, B., Sitorus, T.I.H., Ricardianto, P. (2016): Evaluasi Manajemen Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi Pelabuhan. – Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik 3(3): 367-377.
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2014): Capacity-building for the development and operation of Dry Ports of International Importance. – UIC eNews Official Portal. Available on:
Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. (2014): Visualizing bibliometric networks. – In Measuring Scholarly Impact, Springer, Cham. 35p.
Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. (2010): Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. – Scientometrics 84(2): 523-538.
Zainuddin, N., Mohd Saifudin, A., Zalazilah, M.H., Bahaudin, A.Y., Khalid, R. (2019a): Inland port logistical issues in Northern Region of Peninsular Malaysia. – Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture and Business 3(12): 51-65.
Zainuddin, N., Saifudin, A. M., Zalazilah, M. H., Yusni, A., & Bahaudin, R. K. (2019b). A critical review on the critical success factor of inland port. A case of northern region of peninsular Malaysia. – International Academic Conference (IAC 2018) 14p.
Zin, A.N. (2019): A comparative analysis of dry port developments in developed and developing countries: An implication for Myanmar dry ports. – World Maritime University 96p.