RESIDENT SATISFACTION IN RURAL TOURISM: PRIORITISING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS IN GOPENG, MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6si3.1014Keywords:
rural tourism development, resident satisfaction, social exchange theory, Gopeng, tourism impactsAbstract
This study investigates the effects of social, economic, and environmental dimensions of rural tourism development on resident satisfaction in Gopeng, Perak, Malaysia. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory, the research adopts a quantitative, cross-sectional, explanatory design to test hypotheses derived from prior literature. Data were collected via purposive sampling from 58 residents living near the popular eco-adventure site of Gua Tempurung. Measurement items were adapted from validated tourism impact scales and rated on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression were conducted using SPSS Version 29. Results indicate that social and economic effects are significant and positive predictors of resident satisfaction, with economic factors showing the strongest influence. Social benefits such as enhanced community pride and cultural preservation also contributed substantially to satisfaction. In contrast, environmental effects were not statistically significant, suggesting that, at this stage of development, perceived social and economic gains outweigh environmental considerations in shaping resident attitudes. The overall model explains 74.6% of the variance in satisfaction, indicating substantial explanatory power. The study contributes to theory by refining Social Exchange Theory applications in rural tourism, demonstrating the differential weighting of benefit dimensions in resident evaluations. Practically, the findings highlight the need for policymakers and tourism operators to sustain and equitably distribute economic and social benefits while proactively managing environmental resources to ensure long-term sustainability. Limitations include the cross-sectional design, reliance on self-reported data, and a single-destination sample, suggesting directions for comparative and longitudinal future research.
References
[1] Abukhalifeh, A.N., Wondirad, A. (2019): Contributions of community-based tourism to the socio-economic well-being of local communities: The case of Pulau Redang Island, Malaysia. – International Journal of Tourism Sciences 19(2): 80-97.
[2] Andereck, K.L., Valentine, K.M., Knopf, R.C., Vogt, C.A. (2005): Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. – Annals of Tourism Research 32(4): 1056-1076.
[3] Ap, J. (1992): Residents' perceptions on tourism impacts. – Annals of tourism Research 19(4): 665-690.
[4] Chuang, S.T. (2013): Residents' attitudes toward rural tourism in Taiwan: a comparative viewpoint. – International Journal of Tourism Research 15(2): 152-170.
[5] Gursoy, D., Chi, C.G., Dyer, P. (2010): Locals’ attitudes toward mass and alternative tourism: The case of Sunshine Coast, Australia. – Journal of Travel Research 49(3): 381-394.
[6] Jani, D. (2018): Residents' perception of tourism impacts in Kilimanjaro: An integration of the Social Exchange Theory. – Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal 66(2): 148-160.
[7] Nechifor, C.I. (2014): Tourism and sustainable development: Implications at local community level. – Acta Universitatis Danubius. – Œconomica 10(5): 99-112.
[8] Nunkoo, R., Ramkissoon, H. (2011): Developing a community support model for tourism. – Annals of Tourism Research 38(3): 964-988.
[9] Sharpley, R. (2020): Tourism, sustainable development and the theoretical divide: 20 years on. – Journal of Sustainable Tourism 28(11): 1932-1946.
[10] Stylidis, D. (2016): The role of place image dimensions in residents' support for tourism development. – International Journal of Tourism Research 18(2): 129-139.
[11] Traskevich, A., Fontanari, M. (2023): Tourism potentials in post-COVID19: The concept of destination resilience for advanced sustainable management in tourism. – Tourism Planning & Development 20(1): 12-36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 N H F A A AIMAN, MUHAMMAD SAUFI ANAS, MAZLINA MAHDZAR, ARNI ABDUL GANI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.